• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
My God - HM's just cannot win :(
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
Midspan
04-06-2004
Originally Posted by metafis:
“here we go again. and why isnt Stuart a slapper?, why all the critique against the female and no mention of the Male?
he was just as much a willing party. Does it not occur to anyone that HE will also get the money.”

Not that I'm condoning any action, but I do think she was more willing than he. To go further at least.
robbies_gal
04-06-2004
I think she is after the attention and fame and even if she isnt, doing it on public tv just isnt very nice-i wouldnt want to see my sister/friend/cousin wotever doing it in front of the nation

have some dignity girl!
JonDoe
04-06-2004
What is with the British public is this.

Some like the the flirting and the tabloid tat and will love Michelle and Stuart's carryings on. Others like interesting conversations, intelligent discussion or housemates they can relate to. Others like conflict and general dystopia. You are always going to get one group slamming what another group wants to see.

You can't please all the people all of the time.
Midspan
04-06-2004
Originally Posted by JonDoe:
“Others like interesting conversations, intelligent discussion or housemates they can relate to.”

Didn't realise it was an either/or situation.
Jazmin
04-06-2004
Metafis - well because I feel she was the pursuer. Had it been the other way around, I'd prolly feel that Stu was a slimy creep - especially if his language was like hers.

Can you imagine that?

'Oh right there, just rub my b*lls'



JonDoe
04-06-2004
Originally Posted by Midspan:
“Didn't realise it was an either/or situation.”

Of course it is. Believe it or not there will be a few out there who can relate to Kitten.
yidaho
04-06-2004
Originally Posted by anna123:
“a lot of people have one night stands!”

You're point being?

Quote:
“ I mnea at least michelle have waited 7 days! And for all you know when they come out the house they may do a helen and paul in still be together after 3 years!!! yoiur just dont know!”

They had sex.. and here's the important bit.. broadcast live on national television. No excuses. It's cheap and trashy and they ought to be ashamed of themselves.
Plug
04-06-2004
Originally Posted by Belgarion:
“Absolutely not - I'm always right

No seriously, you have given a reason now - which in my eyes, validates your opinions of her. I may not agree, but at least you have given a constructive reason as to why you dislike her. And that's a good thing. If only other people who give impulsive reasoning would explain it - however briefly - so we know there is a mind behind the words.

”

And... after only 22 posts, into the pomp sump with Hetty you go. <Squelch>
drakaina
04-06-2004
Originally Posted by metafis:
“here we go again. and why isnt Stuart a slapper?, why all the critique against the female and no mention of the Male?
he was just as much a willing party. Does it not occur to anyone that HE will also get the money.”

Oh everyone knows that all men are whores with no self-respect, it's taken as read! People expect better of women, that's all.

The real reason society judges women more harshly than men, is because they have always had and will always have more to lose by being promiscuous.
ludovica
04-06-2004
Originally Posted by brian's eyebrow:
“After I posted my reply I immeadiately thought that this made her little more than a prostitute- sleeping with someone for money.

Perhaps we're all getting hung up on our out-moded ideas of sex?

If you fancy someone, shouldn't you just be able to shag them, provided there are no other parties (wives/husbands/parters etc) to concider?”

Considering the intimacy of sex.. ie, the possibility of pregnancy and/or disease EVERY ONE of us ought to respect ourselves enough to only go with people we care about, who we know respect us and care for our well being and the possible consequences. Therefore I think it is simply ludicrous to think that, even in a private setting, that eight days is an acquaintance long enough for both parties to feel entirely certain of their partner. So to do it on TV?. yuk
Sex between two people can have immense and life changing long term consequences, and should not be treated in a cheap, throwaway manner in my opinion
Straker
04-06-2004
Originally Posted by Belgarion:
“Helen and Paul are together this very day. Jade/PJ was a drunked fumble, which noone 100% knows if it happened or not, and was clearly not a staged event to try and keep themselves in the house. Kate/Spencer? a few kisses (possibly) towards the end of the series, and I didn't see anything contrived there either.”

I’m not making any claims as to those 6 people‘s motives at that time. What I am saying is Michelle (and everyone else watching) saw how it was covered in the papers and how it became a focal point. Jade, Kate and Helen all stayed the distance for a combination of reasons but the promise of romance/sex certainly didn’t hurt their chances.

Originally Posted by Belgarion:
“People such as yourself choose to be the cynic rather than the viewer.”

Is there any television show that invites cynicism more than this one?!?!? A bunch of talent free wannabees behaving like animals for 12 weeks for our vicarious enjoyment. How could you not be cynical?

Originally Posted by Belgarion:
“What I don't understand is on what basis this is on, given that NONE of the previous BB's have had any plants at all, no staged events designed to fool us into thinking it was real.”

Are you serious? They’re all plants to a greater or lesser degree. That really is the most bizarre statement I’ve read.

Originally Posted by Belgarion:
“Sure, Michelle may well be doing all of this purely for the money, fame and future benefits. She could, however, fancied Stu to the point of wanting to shag him senseless. Time will tell which of these is the correct scenario.”

Time’s up. She’s init to winit.

Originally Posted by Belgarion:
“Not all guys will not screw anything that moves.”

Come visit Earth sometime and find out how wrong you are.

Originally Posted by Belgarion:
“Michelle is unaware of the £100,000 bonus for the first BB bonk - she was in isolation when that was announced.”

As pointed out, cash has been on offer before. She’s well aware it will be this time around and moreso, as I said previously, she’s announcing to us that she’s ready and willing to perform sex for the camera. What guy is gonna vote her out after last night?
Evelyn
04-06-2004
yeh, shes comfortable with the whole sex thing, but that doesnt mean she cant actually have feelings for the guy.You'd think if she was thinking tactically then she would of kept us waiting instead of the first week!?
Mabe they just cant get enough of each other and fancy each other to bits and just simply doesnt care.
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map