Giving that it has come out that Dan and Kitten knew each other as Teenagers, why hasn't he challenged Kitten re her lies about her past?

could be he does not know if its true or not

Or it could be that he's just waiting for her to drop herself in it

Meeting someone on the social circuit is not knowing their life story. Also there is an age gap they hardly grew up together.

Just read that mirror article about them knowing each other - I read the same thing on the forums a few days ago

Compare:

The Mirror:
Another mutual friend added: "Kat and Daniel know each other. They've been to parties at each other's houses, gone to same clubs, and lived in same area.

"The word up here is that they were briefed not to say they know each other.

To a forum post here: (http://forum.digitalspy.co.uk/board/...6&postcount=27)
Kat and Daniel know each other quite well - have been to parties at each other's houses, go to same clubs, lived in same neighbourhood. The word up here is that they were briefed not to let on they knew each other.

Very similar huh? :P

and maybe she isn't lying about her past.

is your father an expert on everything about your life?

No - but most people's fathers would notice if their daughter disappeared for a few months. If he says she was at school/college when she claims to have been on the streets/in a squat then I would expect that to be true - if she had disappeared from school for a while at the age of 16, then the school would have had to inform her parents.

Getting back on-topic - did Kitten tell that story to Dan? I was under the impression she'd only told it to Victor in the house, unless Victor told Dan, Dan wouldn't know of the claims anyway.

bearing in my mind that this counter claim comes via an embarrassed father via a tabloid.

I'd be embarrassed!

I thought it came via BBLB when Dermot read out his statement ...?

G