So let me get this right, even though Big Brother warned Kitten that a third strike would result in a housemate being evicted and that Kittens behaviour did result in said third warning, because the choice of punishment was made by Big Brother, Kitten has no responsibility for this eviction?
So a burglar who has been convicted twice, and on each occasion been fined, and who is warned that a further offence will lead to a custodial sentence, who then burgals again and is sentenced to a spell in prison is not responsible for their presence in prison because they did not choose the punishment?
Lunacy...