Originally Posted by dontpannic:
“Except for the fact that Google Navigation is horrible, and uses a lot of data. Also - don't dare stray off your route when you are without signal - it won't cope!”
Define "horrible"? It gets me from A to B without a hitch, I love that I can search for destinations with the same general syntax that I use in Google Maps (ie. I don't necessarily need a street name or postcode for every business. How many other sat navs would get me to the Firdale PLC in Corby without me having to look up its address

). This ease and simplicity raises it miles above "horrible". As for it using lots of data, your source please? I had Google Navigation to work and back today - 50-odd mile round trip - and my total usage for today is 1.38MB, which also includes all the always-on data syncing that takes place. Hardly a lot of data. The maps are vector based and therefore tiny.
Yes its one flaw is that it can't
find a route without a signal (though it can certainly guide you along one). But given the rarity of me not having a signal, this is easily balanced out by the advantages of the software.
Quote:
“You missed a very important statement there...
IN YOUR OPINION
Technically, the "best" phone out right now is in fact the iPhone 4.”
Ah yes, a non-iPhone being the "best" is subjective opinion, but an iPhone being the "best" is technical fact. Mr Jobs, we salute you...
Originally Posted by KOP1975:
“the trouble with the HTC desire is that if you use all 7 screens your battery lasts about half a day.”
No, it doesn't.
If you load all seven screens with a tonne of widgets all set to update every nanosecond then yes, that will put a drain on the battery. But all of the screen lay dormant until you scroll to them (you see them 'update' quickly when you first move on to them) and therefore make zero difference in power whether you use one or seven.