Originally Posted by chloeb:
“ATOS assessors do NOT get commission on rejected claims as the assessors do not make the final decision.
With regards to EPILEPSY. The descriptors and criteria for scoring has been altered numerous times leading to confusion between assessors/auditors/decision makers.
With regards to bathing and epilepsy and PIP, Nobody with epilepsy should be bathing and should be showering, which according to the DWP they can do without supervision and with a shower attachment if needs be. (this is one of the descriptors that was changed) The assessors argued that this was wrong as falling in a shower is equally as dangerous. The DWPs opinion is that at least they won't drown! Unbelievable.
The main issue with epilepsy is the criteria that the condition must affect the claimant 50% or more of the time. It would be highly unusual for someone to be experiencing seizures this often. The problem with PIP is it doesnt take into account RISK
Please ensure that the DWP has scanned all documents into the claim, youd be amazed how often this doesnt happen, leaving the assessor without evidence to refer to.
https://www.epilepsy.org.uk/info/ben...e-payments-pip”
“ATOS assessors do NOT get commission on rejected claims as the assessors do not make the final decision.
With regards to EPILEPSY. The descriptors and criteria for scoring has been altered numerous times leading to confusion between assessors/auditors/decision makers.
With regards to bathing and epilepsy and PIP, Nobody with epilepsy should be bathing and should be showering, which according to the DWP they can do without supervision and with a shower attachment if needs be. (this is one of the descriptors that was changed) The assessors argued that this was wrong as falling in a shower is equally as dangerous. The DWPs opinion is that at least they won't drown! Unbelievable.
The main issue with epilepsy is the criteria that the condition must affect the claimant 50% or more of the time. It would be highly unusual for someone to be experiencing seizures this often. The problem with PIP is it doesnt take into account RISK
Please ensure that the DWP has scanned all documents into the claim, youd be amazed how often this doesnt happen, leaving the assessor without evidence to refer to.
https://www.epilepsy.org.uk/info/ben...e-payments-pip”
But because of how unpredictable it is, you could reasonably argue that for example, he needs supervision whenever he cooks a meal because there is a reasonable chance that he could injure himself.
PIP does take into account risk. I was told to argue that, amongst other things.




