• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Get Off Michelle's Back!
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
biomorph04
05-06-2004
"kiss me" she demands yet again
browolf
05-06-2004
she's dont seem to good at reading body language. Well if she was we wouldnt have got to this. He's hardly been proactive in getting this far.
mannteufel
05-06-2004
We live and learn.

A real hardened case (slut to you) would have abandonded the good ship Stuart last night, when he started fumbling, and by tonight she would have been with A N Other (perhaps she will still end up with Victor), but Michelle seems to be following her heart for now, not always an expedient course of action.

How is having sex under a duvet on late-night TV amoral? It is also debatable whether it leads to loss of self-respect, or whether it boosts self-confidence!

Having said that I agree in part with Juliana's postings, but I am inclined to make allowances for those of a more liberal disposition.
burrogrande
05-06-2004
Michelle has tried disposition...now she wants to try dat one, innit.
jwire1977
05-06-2004
How did it all end up with Stuart and Michelle in bed together this morning? Did His Foppishness wilt in he end under relentless pressure from the rampant Geordie?
Evelyn
05-06-2004
Have you noticed Stuarts been brushing his teeth at least 5 times a day now since him and Michelle has gotten together.
Is his breath dat bad?
jwire1977
05-06-2004
Maybe Stu's just hygenic!
Last edited by jwire1977 : 05-06-2004 at 15:32
Evelyn
05-06-2004
Originally Posted by jwire1977:
“Maybe Stu's just hygenic! ”


Is dat why he's worn the same shorts he was wearing when he was getting it on with Michelle on friday and agian last night..
jwire1977
05-06-2004
Sorry, I was making a gag in poor taste hehe.
JaneDoe
05-06-2004
Originally Posted by mannteufel:
“We live and learn.

A real hardened case (slut to you) would have abandonded the good ship Stuart last night, when he started fumbling, and by tonight she would have been with A N Other (perhaps she will still end up with Victor), but Michelle seems to be following her heart for now, not always an expedient course of action.

How is having sex under a duvet on late-night TV amoral? It is also debatable whether it leads to loss of self-respect, or whether it boosts self-confidence!

Having said that I agree in part with Juliana's postings, but I am inclined to make allowances for those of a more liberal disposition.”


Well said.

Not quite sure how sex on tv is amoral either. Each to his own isn't it? Don't like it, there's always the 'off' button.
quizbuff2000
05-06-2004
Originally Posted by da33431:
“I don't have a problem with her persuing her sexual interest but it all seemed so planned and contrived to me, but that's just how I saw it - maybe I'll be proved wrong!!”

Of course it was planned and contrived. She's never had a meaningful conversation all week, and can barely string two words together. The only thing she has to justify her existence is shameless exploitation of her sexuality.
iain
05-06-2004
Originally Posted by peteisthepete:
“Get Off Michelle's Back!”

sorry - i thought you said *get Michelle off her back!*.

slightly more seriously - she hadn't done herselft any favours with her lame attempt to shock us :

*I love sex, me. I love porn, me. I wanna be a glamour model. If people have a problem with it, then tough!*

no Michelle, we don't have a problem with it, we're just not that shocked or particularly interested really.

Iain
quizbuff2000
05-06-2004
Originally Posted by mannteufel:
“How is having sex under a duvet on late-night TV amoral? It is also debatable whether it leads to loss of self-respect, or whether it boosts self-confidence!
”

Having a predetermined strategy to do practically anything sexually, if it gets a person his/her 15 minutes of infamy, is pretty amoral in my book. A society where values and standards are meaningless, and publicity and cash is everything represents a pretty dark chapter in human history.

Come to think of it, I don't find the mentality of these freakshow participants offensive, so much as just very very sad. The bottom line for women is, that once they offer themselves to all and sundry they will lose the respect of others, as they're not perceived as having any respect for themselves. Whether or not this is RIGHT is another matter, but that's how it is.

I've seen some dark times in my own life, and sometimes my self-respect was the only thing I had left. And it was more valuable than any sum of money. The Michelles of this world will discover that one day. Sadly, it'll probably be the hard way.
Design Girl
05-06-2004
Michelle is a slag. Nothing anyone says can change that.
ludovica
05-06-2004
Originally Posted by quizbuff2000:
“........ A society where values and standards are meaningless, and publicity and cash is everything represents a pretty dark chapter in human history.
....I've seen some dark times in my own life, and sometimes my self-respect was the only thing I had left. And it was more valuable than any sum of money. The Michelles of this world will discover that one day. Sadly, it'll probably be the hard way.”

Class post, agree 100%
Rennie
05-06-2004
I found the whole episode really sad. You hear the phrase 'she threw herself at him' and never is it more appropriate than here! She was flipping between asking for reassurance and then being totally predatory through it all - a very mixed message.

You could almost say it didn't have the clarity or honesty, for want of better words of a one night stand, where if she just said she was up for it - she's dressed it up in her imagination to be more than, yet it hasn't had anywhere near the time or quality to merit anything more than cheap fumble.

Its very sad if this is the only way she can connect.
pgogborn
05-06-2004
Originally Posted by peteisthepete:
“People are too quick to bitch and criticise Michelle.

They call her a sl*t, slapper, wh*re, etc

And Why?”

Presumably because they think she wants to trade sexual gratification for money.

Her current attemps to get one of the men to insert his penis into her vagina may be solely motivated by the £100,000 prize being offered for the first to have sex in the BB house.

She wants to become a glamour model. Perhaps she will not be doing it as a chartible enterprise and will expect people using her as a masturbation fantasy to pay for the privilege.
timepilot
05-06-2004
how many slags and sluts have dissed michelle in this thread?
how many guys who've probably slept with far more partners than michelle? (hey, your mother probably takes it in the back door... that makes your mother a slag in my book)






offensive? quite possibly. No worse than what i've read on here though.
Little Ali
05-06-2004
But Timepilot, nobody has sunk to the level of insulting anyone's family, and nobody bar you has started on other forum members...... do yourself and others a favour and shut up.

I don't think Michelle is a slut/slapper/slag etc, just because she fancied a bloke and went after him. I wouldn't have done it, and she's certainly making a prize prat of herself, but if she was really after the Sun's prize for the first bonk, why tell Marco the morning after that they didn't actually have sex?

I think she really does like him - but she's too short-sighted nad wrapped up in her daydreams to realise that Stuart blatantly doesn't want to be with her. I think it's pretty stupid that people are willing to criticise Michelle but not Stuart - he's a grown man, surely he's heard of the word "no"?
thenetworkbabe
05-06-2004
Originally Posted by pgogborn:
“Presumably because they think she wants to trade sexual gratification for money.

Her current attemps to get one of the men to insert his penis into her vagina may be solely motivated by the £100,000 prize being offered for the first to have sex in the BB house.

.”

I don't think the Sun is too worried. Unless they invite Bert the cameraman under the quilt with them with a close-up lens, I suspect the Sun will say "go away, where is your proof".
pgogborn
05-06-2004
Originally Posted by thenetworkbabe:
“I don't think the Sun is too worried. Unless they invite Bert the cameraman under the quilt with them with a close-up lens, I suspect the Sun will say "go away, where is your proof".”

I know what you mean, but going into pedant mode, this year it is Playboy TV that is offering the sex bounty >
http://www.brandrepublic.com/digital...gin=DB29052004
quizbuff2000
06-06-2004
Originally Posted by Little Ali:
“I think she really does like him - but she's too short-sighted nad wrapped up in her daydreams to realise that Stuart blatantly doesn't want to be with her. I think it's pretty stupid that people are willing to criticise Michelle but not Stuart - he's a grown man, surely he's heard of the word "no"?”

I partly agree with you. Michelle is a transparently predatory slapper, but Stuart's inability to be his own man and distance himself forthrightly (which he appears to wish to do), exposes him as a monumental wimp. When first entering (the House, not Michelle!), he ran around as Kitten's lacky/partner-in-crime, then proceeded to be led around by the gonads by the Byker Grove reject. A weak, weak lad.
quizbuff2000
06-06-2004
Originally Posted by thenetworkbabe:
“I don't think the Sun is too worried. Unless they invite Bert the cameraman under the quilt with them with a close-up lens, I suspect the Sun will say "go away, where is your proof".”

Knowing this lass, you wouldn't put it past her to save some 'forensic evidence!'
malcom
06-06-2004
Every time Michelle is called a slag then so too is Stuart. He is up for it. He is no better the she. Do you think he would say no if the other girls offered themselves!! I doubt it. Stuart is not an inoccent little boy he is a man and just as responsible for his action as she is.

A lot of double standards being expressed on this thread.

Some complain because she is doing it to help stay in the game. Well,surprise surprise it is a game show and don't people in games play a game?? Why should she be hated for that also...As i said. double standards all round.......
ludovica
06-06-2004
I think a LOT of people on this thread have condemned Stuarts actions!...
Unfortunately in the real world people appear to think male promiscuity is acceptable, when, in fact all promiscuity, both male AND female is (IMO) ill advised for a variety of reasons which are not always entirely obvious until after the deed is done
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map