Options
Interesting article in Reveal magazine about Steve Gill
foxy23
Posts: 4,392 Forum Member
✭✭✭
From his ex wife who has his first 3 children.
She states he is far from the 'family man' the show AND him have painted him to be!
She says that he has not been involved in their lifes and that two of his three children actuall hate him and refuse to watch the show!
Could be just a bitter ex wife, but very interesting nevertheless!!
She states he is far from the 'family man' the show AND him have painted him to be!
She says that he has not been involved in their lifes and that two of his three children actuall hate him and refuse to watch the show!
Could be just a bitter ex wife, but very interesting nevertheless!!
0
Comments
Hmm, I read something similar to this in a thread a couple of weeks ago. Makes me wonder whether he really was as quite as he was in the house (up until a few days ago)
He's a game player. We're not seeing the real Steve (whoever that is).
He is so vulgar with his comments about the opposite sex, his language is vulgar too.
The way he is over Rachel & Keeley turns my stomach - he is such a lecherous creep.
But this is never shown in the highlights shows.
He said something on the first day or so about how he wears his black eye to intimidate people, which made me suspicious as to his character. What sort of man takes pleasure from intimidating people? And the remark he made to Ife and Mario (which I understand wasn't shown on the HLs) about 'f*cking with Keeley's head for the sheer fun of it' just supports my earlier idea that he isn't really a very nice man at all.
I get that feeling too. I think underneath he's a person that has very strong opinions on certain matters and in the outside world would voice them readily. He's definitely holding back because he knows those who are confrontationall are always the first to be booted out!
Shame HLs didn't show this.
He seems to be very well guarded in respect for being in there for 5 weeks & all of sudden, 3 new HM's go in & now we see tid bit's on HLs. Wonder why nothing really about him has been shown previously?
That is the part I can't figure out yet.
Watched on LF Keeley discussing what Rachel had stated, but I didn't hear who initially told him about how he was being seen in his actions towards Keeley. Still think DR is who told him just before Keeley tried to explain it.
At night on LF he has been seen to have the occasional (not pleasant) outbursts , a lot of swearing (then muted) and then snoring . He was edited quite a bit on that but even when the newbies first came in and tried conversing - it was very painful to watch as monosyllabic stilted "conversations"
I have never warmed to him, and have always felt as though under the surface, a very different Steve is being stifled.
Game player? Most definitely. All round nice guy? I suspect not. When he started to attack Ben on his views of WW2 with his opinion that Ben had no right to hold an opinion, it felt like the real Steve was creeping out.
I'm glad Steve has now started to receive some votes, as hopefully it is just a matter of time before he is up for eviction.
Dave was talking to Steve about looking like Hugh Hefner and a comment to that effect had been made jokingly. It seems Rachel told Steve (or maybe to others reported back) he needed to be more careful how it might be portrayed to the viewers (threads here suggest it was perceptive).
By Ben, of course.
Yes I knew all of that but when Steve was talking to Dave in kitchen, he was really angry over what he had been informed. Which we know it was about Keeley, but I still don't know who initially warned him to send him into a mad rant like he had. I just don't think it was merely Dave passing judgement.
I love that!!!! It is so apt!
Agree with both of you.
Not impressed with the guy at all. He seems to have flown under the radar thus far - or had the hero worship. Was Ben the first one to nominate him?
Totally agree with you.
I have an awful feeling BB want him to win and as such will of course ensure he does win in the usual way by manipulating HMs and how they are portrayed on the highlights.
I find it hard to believe that Steve's ex-wife has kept her view of her ex-husband hidden from their children, and if she thinks she's done them a favour by
by ridiculing Steve - she hasn't. Whatever you think of your ex-husband, he gave 50% of your children's DNA - just think what message that sends out to them as to their worth.
Enjoy your magazine fee.
So DNA is everything?
What about upbringing, input, morals, love and care and all the hard work that goes into bringing a child up - it's not just about percentage in sperm count.