• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
Could the dr be considered a superhero?
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
rossyrahrah
26-07-2010
Originally Posted by tingramretro:
“Personally, while not wishing to knock the man of steel, I'd say that the lack of super powers is precisely what makes Batman more heroic than Superman. Far from being just a rich bloke with some toys, he is a man who has trained himself to be the ultimate human, physically and mentally, through years of sheer dedication to his cause, and who uses the skills he's obtained to routinely put his life on the line for others. Superman, by contrast, has never had to work that hard and is virtually invulnerable. Who is more of a believable role model?

An aside: in Grant Morrison's Justice League series, there is possibly my favourite ever scene focusing on Batman, and Batman doesn't even appear in it. The League have been defeated by invading aliens, all except Batman, who escaped. In this scene, the alien commander is in his control room receiving reports from his subordinates-reports indicating that the shape changing, heavily armed and super powered aliens are being picked off one by one, by Batman. The commander screams that this can't be happening because 'he's just one man'-and a manacled, bruised and battered Superman, hanging from the wall behind him, laughs and through a malicious smile retorts ' just one man. The most dangerous man on Earth'.That, to me, sums up Batman perfectly. He does the impossible through sheer determination.

As for your last point: yes, the Doctor allows others to sacrifice themselves, but that isn't unheroic, that's just having respect for their personal choices. The Doctor still routinely offers to sacrifice himself for the greater good, and that is much more important when considering his status, I think. Yes, he's a hero Of course he is.”

Ok, Batman is a hero, but what is it that makes him "super" then?

The Doctor is a tough one to call, there are many elements according to which incarnation you look at, that are rather unheroic. IIRC, Mr Hartnell certainly didn't portray him as a hero, more of a wanderer.

Jon Pertwee was the closest to a conventional hero but I've never felt that the Doctor intentionally seeks out wrongs to right, it just sort of happens to him.
tingramretro
26-07-2010
Originally Posted by rossyrahrah:
“Ok, Batman is a hero, but what is it that makes him "super" then?”

You don't need super powers to be super. That was kind of my point. Batman is effectively superhuman but on a level that any human could in theory attain through hard work. That's what makes him a superhero.
Quote:
“The Doctor is a tough one to call, there are many elements according to which incarnation you look at, that are rather unheroic. IIRC, Mr Hartnell certainly didn't portray him as a hero, more of a wanderer.

Jon Pertwee was the closest to a conventional hero but I've never felt that the Doctor intentionally seeks out wrongs to right, it just sort of happens to him.”

In the classic series yes, up until 1988 at least. McCoy's Doctor, on the other hand, was much more proactive, seeming to be a man on a mission which he took extremely seriously despite the clownish facade. And while the eighth Doctor was more of a return to the aimless wanderer, since nu-Who started I think it's been apparent that the Doctor does seek out wrongs to right, seemingly for the fun of it! Does his flippant attitude make him more or less heroic, I wonder?
rossyrahrah
26-07-2010
Originally Posted by tingramretro:
“You don't need super powers to be super. That was kind of my point. Batman is effectively superhuman but on a level that any human could in theory attain through hard work. That's what makes him a superhero.”

I do see your point and why that would be appealing but I can't help feeling that it's that attainability which makes him less of what I would consider erm superness whilst still retaining heroism.
Quote:
“In the classic series yes, up until 1988 at least. McCoy's Doctor, on the other hand, was much more proactive, seeming to be a man on a mission which he took extremely seriously despite the clownish facade. And while the eigth Doctor was more of a return to the aimless wanderer, since nu-Who started I think it's been apparent that the Doctor does seek out wrongs to right, seemingly for the fun of it! Does his flippant attitude make him more or less heroic, I wonder?”

It's all fun and games til someone gets blown out of an airlock!

I thought David Tennant's doctor was a little bit too focused on re-ordering the universe according to his design, whilst not always being particularly successful at it.
Christopher Eccleston seemed a bit more aimless, which I preferred.

Having said that, I'm tempted to go back and watch some Sylvester McCoy now. I never really picked up on the man with a mission first time round but then I was 11 and I just wanted a bomber jacket and a baseball bat like Ace
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map