Endemol/C4 are almost certainly financially liable for Keeley's injury and should make substantial compensation in the mid six figure range or face litigation.
Endemol/C4 did not take due care and attention to ensure the health and safety of a person contractually in their care, resulting in their serious injury, furthermore, they were arguably willfully negligent in that a reasonable person could have predicted that an accident was possible or likely in that task.
So why should she receive such a large settlement? This injury will prevent Keeley from pursuing lucrative magazine contracts, which would have been otherwise available. These contracts are typically time-limited for a housemate leaving the BB house, so the settlement should reflect the likelihood that such contracts will no longer be available once she is fully recovered, and included in which should be an estimate of the total amount of earnings had she left uninjured.
Additionally, there is the standard compensation for an injury such as this acquired in the legal care and at fault of another party.
The only way Endemol/C4 can avoid this is by offering Keeley just the standard injury compensation and requiring her to accept this, in writing, as full and final settlement as part of an agreement to re-insert her into the BB house. This is what they are trying to do and this would be very unwise of Keeley to accept this. The only terms on which Keeley should re-enter the BB house is a very large settlement in the event of her leaving the house while still recovering from her injury.
I hope she is receiving good advice on this matter from a lawyer employed by her.
Endemol/C4 did not take due care and attention to ensure the health and safety of a person contractually in their care, resulting in their serious injury, furthermore, they were arguably willfully negligent in that a reasonable person could have predicted that an accident was possible or likely in that task.
So why should she receive such a large settlement? This injury will prevent Keeley from pursuing lucrative magazine contracts, which would have been otherwise available. These contracts are typically time-limited for a housemate leaving the BB house, so the settlement should reflect the likelihood that such contracts will no longer be available once she is fully recovered, and included in which should be an estimate of the total amount of earnings had she left uninjured.
Additionally, there is the standard compensation for an injury such as this acquired in the legal care and at fault of another party.
The only way Endemol/C4 can avoid this is by offering Keeley just the standard injury compensation and requiring her to accept this, in writing, as full and final settlement as part of an agreement to re-insert her into the BB house. This is what they are trying to do and this would be very unwise of Keeley to accept this. The only terms on which Keeley should re-enter the BB house is a very large settlement in the event of her leaving the house while still recovering from her injury.
I hope she is receiving good advice on this matter from a lawyer employed by her.





.