• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
Sherlock - New BBC Drama
<<
<
12 of 151
>>
>
Aerik
25-07-2010
Originally Posted by zwixxx:
“re: pills, both were poison but cabbie'd taken the antidote, right ?!”

No, one was poison, one was harmless. It was chance to us mere mortals but seeing as the cabbie was a genius he knew how people would think and knew they would take the poisoned pill. Think Derren Brown here.

Sherlock was disappointed because he'd never know if he outwitted the cabbie and would have taken the harmless pill or not. I want to know too!!
wildangel
25-07-2010
Wasn't going to watch tonight (recorded it for later) but ended up sitting through the whole thing. Brilliant stuff.
sheff71
25-07-2010
Originally Posted by Who Am I?:
“I loved it - enough nods to the traditional with Inspector Lestrade, Mrs Hudson and the violin and brought back up to date very cleverly. I also found Sherlock strangely attractive.

Thought the performances by the two leads was fantastic and Martin Freeman was much better as Watson than I would have imagined.”

I don't think too many will have expected such a good quality performance from Martin Freeman, and as most have said, the two leads meshed excellently.

Nice twist with the brother, though you never know, he could yet turn out to be Moriarty (or part of a Moriarty Group!)

Top quality few hours on the beeb, with an excellent Top Gear earlier
slappers r us
25-07-2010
Originally Posted by kevinamorris:
“It was brilliantly clever, v.witty, esp " a three patch problem". Worth the license fee, that's what the Beeb can do......”

I dont mind the license fee if we get more like this
Get Carter
25-07-2010
As a fan of Sherlock Holmes, in his many incarnations, I was really looking forward to this for ages. it looked perfect on paper.
Moffat and Gatiss..check
Benedict Cumberbatch...check
Martin Freeman...check
Rupert Graves..check;

Would it live up to my expectations ?


Hell yes and then some. Fan bloody tactic.

My only criticism ..only two more episode. I demand that the BBC sign up the cast, writers and production team for a 13 part series...well they can do it for the likes of Dr Who and Merlin and on one outing alone, this is worth it.
dizzy_blonde
25-07-2010
Elementary! He's Sherlock Holmes...he would have taken the harmless one
Jenna Corinth
25-07-2010
Most homoerotic Holmes and Watson so far (including the Guy Ritchie film and that's saying something)! Loved it
Aerik
25-07-2010
Originally Posted by Gill P:
“I agree - I too thought Martin Freeman was brilliant - the best he has ever been in my opinion.”

I think I've only ever seen him in Charles II, so I haven't much to go on. I thought he was great in this.

All the actors were superb in my opinion. Some top notch talent there.
sheff71
25-07-2010
I was hoping Holmes would quickly grab both capsules and mix them up, and then see how confident the Cabbie was...
debshertsuk
25-07-2010
I knew something was missing from my TV life... this! When we lost DT as Dr Who I waved a sad bye bye as I didn't like the look and feel of the new series (too teenage - didn't really like Matt Smith, etc.)

I loved this. It was amazing how quickly 90 minutes whizzed by! Apart from the fact that I had to pee I would have gladly sat and watched for another 90 minutes!
Daewos
25-07-2010
Good grief - how unusual to see such a united thread with so many positive comments. I would agree - bleeding marvellous.
Chris1964
25-07-2010
I liked it though maybe not to the extent of shouting from the rooftops. Some of the fastpaced showy deduction from Holmes was just a little bit overdone imo and Benedict somehow looks a bit too much like he should be attending a lecture at uni. The music and the camerawork remind me of the recent big screen effort and I have to say that, despite it being a modern version there was a very old London feel to the sets.
I thought the last half hour with the scenes involvlng Phil Davis was a notch above the rest. I will be watching next week hopefully.
GreenJellyJam
25-07-2010
I loved it! I was really worried about how they would potray Holmes but it was all brilliant I wish we could have known which pill was the harmless and which one was not!
LostFool
25-07-2010
Originally Posted by Blake Connolly:
“Really enjoyed it. Very silly, but in the best possible way. Been a long time since I've enjoyed a British detective show as much as that, looking forward to next week's.”

Unfortunately for every British detective show like this we are given dozens of tosh shows like Paradox and Identity.
Aerik
25-07-2010
Originally Posted by sheff71:
“I was hoping Holmes would quickly grab both capsules and mix them up, and then see how confident the Cabbie was... ”

He rattled him a bit didn't he with all the family stuff, but the cabbie recovered well. Would have liked some kind of further poking at the cabbie's confidence, like you say.
abercrombie
25-07-2010
Princess Bride is trending on Twitter. Is it because of Sherlock?

Apparently the pill thing was in the original study in scarlett story, but, having read it as a wee nipper, I don't remember that far back
Serenity79
25-07-2010
Fantastic! I loved it! Sure it's got the Moff written all over it (a good thing!) but it's also got a style all it's own, it's set in modern London obviously but there's still a touch of that period feel coming through. Can't wait to see the next two episodes.
zwixxx
25-07-2010
Originally Posted by Aerik:
“No, one was poison, one was harmless.”

Baddie Cabbie coulda been lying about that though.

I also thought maybe the autopsies had revealed the poison used and our ever prepared Detective had taken the antidote earlier that day in preparation for this inevitable encounter.
solenoid
25-07-2010
Originally Posted by horsesvscats:
“Digital Sid I think you'll enjoy one of Mitch Benn's latest tweets: It's now my mission to find all the "abolish licence fee" f***ers, gaffer tape them to a chair watching #Sherlock while screaming "REALLY?"”

Because obviously a commercial channel like ITV could never have produced a Sherlock Holmes series..
Aerik
25-07-2010
I really liked the portrayal of John Watson. He can tend towards being bumbling in some versions, but here he was very dark and I liked that he killed the cabbie at the end; it gives him a lot of depth I think.
Cheapthrills
25-07-2010
Just wish Moffat got to Sherlock before Guy Ritchie
Servalan
25-07-2010
Originally Posted by sn_22:
“I doubt it - in fact, I'd suggest its quite the opposite. If they're prepared to write-off 800k just in order to get the start right, they must have high hopes for it's future.”

I suspect you will find that the reality is a little more complicated than this ...

Despite the BBC's press statement a couple of months ago, it is highly unusual for them to film a drama pilot and then not broadcast it. The BBC has done it only once in the last ten or so years - unlike ITV, which has entire series sat on shelves gathering dust because they're deemed too bad to broadcast.

The rationale behind the move to reshoot the pilot then add two more 90-minute episodes is, I would guess, more closely linked to the BBC's reliance upon Steven Moffat than on any faith they might or might not have in this project. Binning Sherlock completely would run the risk of alienating a writer they need on one of their biggest franchises - a writer who can get work in Hollywood - so it's a better bet to keep him sweet.

Choosing then to broadcast this high profile new series during July/August is a bit of a slap in the face: that's the time you use to bury projects you're not entirely happy with, in the hope most people will be on holiday. And given that this was good - and, indeed, miles better than anything ITV has served up recently - that decision can only be branded baffling. Unless it was a deliberate move to try and grow a new returning series away from the fiercer competition of the autumn/winter schedules?

I'd agree with many of the enthusiastic comments on here, and also with posters making (valid) comparisons with Doctor Who. The only thing I'd add is that the plotting was significantly better than some of Moffat's and indeed all of Gatiss' work on the last series of DW.

I await the overnight viewing figures with interest ...
solenoid
25-07-2010
deleted post.
aardvark85
25-07-2010
pleased gatiss was the prof. just about take him as mycroft, though I think Tim McInnerny would've been better. Freeman is good, though it would've been interesting to see an older actor (Carlyle? Eccleston?) as Watson. Interesting to see who is moriarty

Rupert Graves is odd choice, he is a brilliant charismatic villain but casting him as Lestrade is weird. My choice for Lestrade would have been Hugh Laurie in twit mode.
Aerik
25-07-2010
Originally Posted by zwixxx:
“Baddie Cabbie coulda been lying about that though.

I also thought maybe the autopsies had revealed the poison used and our ever prepared Detective had taken the antidote earlier that day in preparation for this inevitable encounter.”

Now *that* would have been good. Imagine the cabbie's face if he thinks Sherlock has taken the poison, only to not have done, and left the cabbie with the harmless pill thinking it's poison. Mind f*ck time!
<<
<
12 of 151
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map