Hi everyone! I'm new here so hopefully my first post goes okay

I was wondering your view on consistent scores, I've recently rewatched the 5 series and I noticed something interesting about Ruthie's marking.

For the 6 weeks that Melinda Messenger skated, Ruthie awarded her a 3.5 for each week she skated, Roxanne Pallet also received a 3.0 for the first 6 weeks she skated before finally receiving a 4.0 for her props routines.

Is there another case of consistent marking for such a long period by any of the judges? I know Danny Young was awarded 17 points for 5 weeks running but received varied marks from the judges during that period.

WHoops just actually read what you asked for

Hi. Welcome to DS.

Ruthie was an idiot which explains the same scores every week whenever some of the celebs deserved more. I remember Ruthie always giving Roxanne really low scores whenever she deserved more.

With Danny there was a few times where he deserved a lot more than 17 and some where he deserved a little less.

Linda Lusardi always got around the same score according to Twitter. It's fair to give them the same score if they where just as good as last week but if they are better they should get more and if they aren't as good give them lower.

Personally I thought Ruthie was a rubbish judge - the week she gave Zoe a 6 was just pathetic.

Danny and Kieron I thought were consistently undermarked and in Danny's case Frankie had every right to be annoyed about it.