Forums
 

Heat Magazine...


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-08-2010, 19:49   #26
parthy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeLush View Post
lol LOVE ACTUALLY is one of those films thats grown on me over the years... i always felt though that emma thomspon and alan rickman storyline could have been done more justice & martine and hugh grant and left out the body doubles or the bloke who goes off to the states instead...
Exactly, that was my problem with the film, there was too many storylines and they were of such varying quality from the heartfelt to the utterly ridiculous (The guy going to the states, and Colin Firth's storyline.) I found the Keira Knightley storyline a bit treacly too.

I would've have like to see more of the Emma Thompson/Alan Rickman, Hugh Grant/Martine McCutcheon and Laura Linney storylines.

I'm generally not a fan of Richard Curtis's films. They always feel a bit manipulative to me.
parthy is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 04-08-2010, 19:49   #27
GlassBalloon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin
Posts: 1,881
I used to buy Heat, Star and New every week, but I found that they all told the same story, but I liked Heat the best so I stuck with that and dumped the other two. That was three years ago, and the only mag I buy now is still Heat. Mainly because I can't be done with looking for another celeb mag. I've gotten Closer and More free with Heat a few times and didn't like them. Heat does me nicely. Granted, I'm not a massive fan of it's newest makeover but it provides me with enough celeb goss to keep me satisfied
GlassBalloon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 20:38   #28
Liss88
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Reading/Birmingham
Posts: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlassBalloon View Post
I used to buy Heat, Star and New every week, but I found that they all told the same story, but I liked Heat the best so I stuck with that and dumped the other two. That was three years ago, and the only mag I buy now is still Heat. Mainly because I can't be done with looking for another celeb mag. I've gotten Closer and More free with Heat a few times and didn't like them. Heat does me nicely. Granted, I'm not a massive fan of it's newest makeover but it provides me with enough celeb goss to keep me satisfied
It's not "celeb goss" though, it's made up tripe conjured up by PR people to cover up more juicy stories or to create gossip for boring celebs. Personally, I don't waste my money on these embarrassingly terribly written stories, I read all the celeb gossip in the BI thread on DS!
Liss88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 20:46   #29
parthy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,822
DeeLush, for well-written celeb gossip, might I recommend DListed? It mostly features American celebs but also has UK ones. It's very filthy, be warned!
parthy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 21:42   #30
DeeLush
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fareham
Services: SKY/ talk talk
Posts: 2,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by parthy View Post
DeeLush, for well-written celeb gossip, might I recommend DListed? It mostly features American celebs but also has UK ones. It's very filthy, be warned!
OO sounds like my kind of magazine
DeeLush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 22:10   #31
BadRomance
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,455
I used to love Heat as well but cant stand it now. I agree with all the OP's points. They are just waaaaay to obsessed with Chavvy Cole for my liking. Last month I said I would buy it again, give it a second chance. It had umpteen pages on Chavvy's malaria, yet didnt even mention that Dannii had just given birth, which should have been in that issue, given Ethan was born the week before! It also seems to have a lot of American "stars" that I have never even heard of before.
BadRomance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 22:11   #32
funci
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Deal, Kent
Services: Sky+
Posts: 751
When I bought the first copy, must be 10 years ago now. I was really impressed at the high standard of writing and the edginess of the articles. I loved the quirkiness of the photo shoots, the sarcasm of the soap previews and the insight to a (then unknown) world of celebrity.

Then along came the internet to a wider market and Heat started to struggle. They needed to produce a magazine that was full of the news already readily available online, but make it appeal to the mass market so came up with the 'ingenious' idea to turn it into a women's fashion mag cum National Enquirer as well. Massive mistake.

Someone touched on it earlier when they said that Heat was trying to be too many things as once. I think that Heat should stop dumbing down and get back to basics.

There are people, myself included in that, who would willingly buy a magazine that focuses on real issues, British based celebrities, film and tv reviews and music.

I'm fed up of seeing stories about people who are famous for doing nothing, when magazines should be full of actors, TV presenters and musicians who actually work for a living.
funci is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 22:13   #33
BadRomance
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by funci View Post
When I bought the first copy, must be 10 years ago now. I was really impressed at the high standard of writing and the edginess of the articles. I loved the quirkiness of the photo shoots, the sarcasm of the soap previews and the insight to a (then unknown) world of celebrity.

Then along came the internet to a wider market and Heat started to struggle. They needed to produce a magazine that was full of the news already readily available online, but make it appeal to the mass market so came up with the 'ingenious' idea to turn it into a women's fashion mag cum National Enquirer as well. Massive mistake.

Someone touched on it earlier when they said that Heat was trying to be too many things as once. I think that Heat should stop dumbing down and get back to basics.

There are people, myself included in that, who would willingly buy a magazine that focuses on real issues, British based celebrities, film and tv reviews and music.

I'm fed up of seeing stories about people who are famous for doing nothing, when magazines should be full of actors, TV presenters and musicians who actually work for a living.
If this was Facebook, I'd like your post!!
BadRomance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 22:15   #34
MJ_lives
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The TARDIS.
Services: Her Majesty Lady Gaga.
Posts: 6,097
I like More magazine out of all the weekly magazines. It has the weekly Alan Carr interview, the 10 weekly beauty tips, great fashion and make up tips, and, best of all, men overheard

The only time I read Heat is if a friend has it. It's okay I suppose as it will have a good interview, but that Lucie Cave annoys me beyond belief. She seems to think she is some sort of mini celbrity or something. Very delusional.

They do seem anti size zero though, I suppose that's one good thing about them.
MJ_lives is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 22:24   #35
funci
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Deal, Kent
Services: Sky+
Posts: 751
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadRomance View Post
If this was Facebook, I'd like your post!!

Ha! Thank you, high praise indeed!
funci is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 22:33   #36
parthy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeLush View Post
OO sounds like my kind of magazine
Well, it's a website!
parthy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 22:34   #37
Jerrica09
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeLush View Post
wow i'd forgotten all about that!
Was that the 'Harveys gonna eat me!' sticker? I was shocked when I bought that issue. OK! is just as bad, bringing out Jades memorial issue before she had died, just to make sure they had the exclusive.
Jerrica09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 22:37   #38
parthy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ_lives View Post
I like More magazine out of all the weekly magazines.
Gawd, I used to LOVE that magazine when I was 17 or 18, it was full of informative sex tips for a young virgin interested in being deflowered.
parthy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 23:07   #39
MJ_lives
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The TARDIS.
Services: Her Majesty Lady Gaga.
Posts: 6,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by parthy View Post
Gawd, I used to LOVE that magazine when I was 17 or 18, it was full of informative sex tips for a young virgin interested in being deflowered.
Well, it must have changed since then. It has position of the week, but apart from that...

Tbh I like magazines to see what fashions are current and in at the moment, so then I know to avoid them. I do like a witty celebrity interview too
MJ_lives is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 23:15   #40
parthy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ_lives View Post
Well, it must have changed since then. It has position of the week, but apart from that...

Tbh I like magazines to see what fashions are current and in at the moment, so then I know to avoid them. I do like a witty celebrity interview too
This was 2001/2002 and it was FULL of sex, not just 'position of the week'!

So you don't do fashion trends then?
parthy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 23:30   #41
MJ_lives
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The TARDIS.
Services: Her Majesty Lady Gaga.
Posts: 6,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by parthy View Post
This was 2001/2002 and it was FULL of sex, not just 'position of the week'!

So you don't do fashion trends then?
Nah, I've always preferred to be a bit different and stand out from the crowd with what I wear. I'm no Lady Gaga though!
MJ_lives is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 23:50   #42
VoodooChic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: I am MALE
Posts: 6,986
Like many others, I gave up reading it about 3 years ago....absolute waste of everyone's energy - readers and heatstaff alike
VoodooChic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 00:10   #43
sleepydove
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,806
I used to read Heat up until 2006-07 and enjoyed it at the time though I knew it was trashy. It was a guilty pleasure.

Now? I buy it every now and then but it's rubbish. It takes me five mins to flick through the whole thing and there is nothing I want to read.
sleepydove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 00:23   #44
lexy_86
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: on her ivory tower
Services: for cash, all major credit/debit cards accepted.
Posts: 2,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerrica09 View Post
Was that the 'Harveys gonna eat me!' sticker? I was shocked when I bought that issue. OK! is just as bad, bringing out Jades memorial issue before she had died, just to make sure they had the exclusive.
Agreed, havent even looked at OK since then.

To be honest I don't need much motivation not to buy gossip mags these days- they are mostly full of shit!
lexy_86 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 00:24   #45
cnbcwatcher
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: In my IT Law lecturer's office
Services: TV, MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, iPod Touch 4G, Samsung Galaxy Ace 2
Posts: 39,255
I read it once back in 2002, its absolute rubbish. I've seen it in a couple of waiting rooms though and flicked through it when bored. Great for reading in the toilet maybe but that's about all
cnbcwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 00:40   #46
shoesgirl
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 171
I used to love it but haven't bought it since soon after Mark Frith left.

It used to have lots of tongue in cheek humour and the interviews were quirky and funny back in the day. Now it's full of so called celebs I've never heard of - and I always used to think I kept up with things.
I also don't like the way one week someone is the best dressed and the next week the same person in the same outfit is "What were they thinking" same with the "Celebrate curves" one week then "Too fat" the next. Far too much contradiction.

It used to resemble a grown up "Smash Hits" from when SH had a sense of humour and was in it's heyday. Now it's a collection of brief articles, recycled interviews and lots of papped pics of nobodies. I can't see it surviving much longer unless they have a major overhaul.
shoesgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 00:42   #47
Maysie07
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 106
I don't know if anyone has recently notised but it has had big changes over the last 6 weeks - sine it has come under a new Editor.

For some reason it now feels it should include fashion when magazines like Look are far superior. What really annoys me though is how iw was once very sarcastic and dry is now just plain nasty and critical of anyone/clebrities who don't bow down to them.

TBH Look and Now are far superior. HEAT is dying a slow death.
Maysie07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 01:12   #48
DeeLush
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fareham
Services: SKY/ talk talk
Posts: 2,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by funci View Post
When I bought the first copy, must be 10 years ago now. I was really impressed at the high standard of writing and the edginess of the articles. I loved the quirkiness of the photo shoots, the sarcasm of the soap previews and the insight to a (then unknown) world of celebrity.

Then along came the internet to a wider market and Heat started to struggle. They needed to produce a magazine that was full of the news already readily available online, but make it appeal to the mass market so came up with the 'ingenious' idea to turn it into a women's fashion mag cum National Enquirer as well. Massive mistake.

Someone touched on it earlier when they said that Heat was trying to be too many things as once. I think that Heat should stop dumbing down and get back to basics.

There are people, myself included in that, who would willingly buy a magazine that focuses on real issues, British based celebrities, film and tv reviews and music.

I'm fed up of seeing stories about people who are famous for doing nothing, when magazines should be full of actors, TV presenters and musicians who actually work for a living.
It was me (the OP) who said about it being too many things too too many people and dumbed down...

I want my old HEAT back, something witty, unbiased and not sucking up to people like cheryl cole.. i remember them doing an interview with GA about 3 yrs after they got together and every single member being bitchy and rude and HEAT moaning about them being stroppy little madams, forward 5 yrs or so and theyre kissing the arses of the people they used to poke fun at.

HEAT for me has lost its Mojo
DeeLush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 01:15   #49
DeeLush
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Fareham
Services: SKY/ talk talk
Posts: 2,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maysie07 View Post
I don't know if anyone has recently notised but it has had big changes over the last 6 weeks - sine it has come under a new Editor.

For some reason it now feels it should include fashion when magazines like Look are far superior. What really annoys me though is how iw was once very sarcastic and dry is now just plain nasty and critical of anyone/clebrities who don't bow down to them.

TBH Look and Now are far superior. HEAT is dying a slow death.
I hate how TEENY its become ruined it for me.
DeeLush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2010, 01:29   #50
S4BUK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 79
I buy Heat religiously and have done since the first issue and I have no idea why. As a male I absolutely hate the fact that half of ithas turned into 'Style/Fashion'. I do love the (main) interviews though.
S4BUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:14.