• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Entertainment
  • Music
The most incredible Sugababes "live" performance EVAR!
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
Sweet FA
10-08-2010
Originally Posted by Unigal07:
“Great lineup, but Keisha, Siobhan and Mutya were the original and best imo ”

Originally Posted by Star_Bright:
“I love 1.0 and 2.0.

Was gutted when Mutya left and knew the group would never be the same ”

Just bought 'Overloaded: The Singles Collection' and was reminded of how wonderful Siobhan's voice was on the track Overload. Not even sure why Amelle's on the cover - should really be Mutya.

Line-ups 1 & 2 will never be matched, with no. 4 being particularly farcical.
rivercity_rules
10-08-2010
Originally Posted by Unigal07:
“Great lineup, but Keisha, Siobhan and Mutya were the original and best imo ”

Not a massive fan of Siobhan in Sugababes to be honest. I liked a couple of her solo tracks and I do like 1.0s album, I just prefer Heidi to be honest, I think she was a well timed imposter.

Those that followed not so much.

It's a travesty that the 3 desperados as they are now are allowed to tarnish the previously good name of the Sugababes.
Dizagaox
10-08-2010
Originally Posted by Sweet FA:
“Not even sure why Amelle's on the cover - should really be Mutya.”

Keisha, dude. This is a pretty well known story.
vkmax
10-08-2010
^ Keisha pretty much said something like "Why would Mutya be on it? Amelle's the one promoting it. Besides it's just a photo"

I hope/think that if there's another 'Best Of...' it'll just be a plain black or white cover with gold 'SUGABABES' and perhaps the silouhette of 3 girls (like the old 'Eternal' logo). Can't be bothered with 'Keisha should be on it - Mutya should - Jade shouldn't - Yes she should'
Unigal07
10-08-2010
Originally Posted by rivercity_rules:
“Not a massive fan of Siobhan in Sugababes to be honest. I liked a couple of her solo tracks and I do like 1.0s album, I just prefer Heidi to be honest, I think she was a well timed imposter.

Those that followed not so much.

It's a travesty that the 3 desperados as they are now are allowed to tarnish the previously good name of the Sugababes.”

Oh I've got nothing against Heidi, in fact I've always quite liked her. Just thought 1.0 was the best - they were like no other girlband around. Loved 2.0 too.

When Mutya left, didn't warm to Amelle and missed Mutya's voice. Then when Keisha left, I gave up. No original members = not the Sugababes.

And I agree with your last line
vkmax
10-08-2010
I partially agree ^ in that Sugababes aren't Sugababes anymore HOWEVER I believe that Sugababes were sultry, subtle teenagers and the first line up was the TRUE Sugababes that the group and management intended the world to know.

The second line up is the one that the world were familiar with and I don't think it's fair to say 4.0 ended it because 3.0 did. I'm a fan of all of them but with 3.0 the songs got more shallow, the sponsorships came thick and fast, the outfits matched, the dancers came, the image changed - they became a "Smash Hits" act and post "The singles collection" lost thier identity.

The songs lost thier edge, the girls lost thier edge and they became industry play dolls. Simply because Keisha, Heidi and Amelle wanted the fame so much where as Siobhan IS music - she lives it, Mutya is attitude. Amelle is a tough girl but she wont go back to performing at Princes Hall in Aldershot, she had to get away from what she had, Heidi is pop by numbers and Keisha is a fame monster. The last 'Sugababes' release - IMO was "Easy" and "Walk this way" confirmed they were no longer that band.
Dizagaox
11-08-2010
I think it's ridiculous that people take issue with them using the Sugababes name.

Let's say they used another name, they would be considered one of the best girlbands around anywhere. Why get so worked up over a name?
Star_Bright
11-08-2010
Originally Posted by Dizagaox:
“I think it's ridiculous that people take issue with them using the Sugababes name.

Let's say they used another name, they would be considered one of the best girlbands around anywhere. Why get so worked up over a name?”

I highly doubt that.
james-dean
11-08-2010
Originally Posted by rivercity_rules:
“Not a massive fan of Siobhan in Sugababes to be honest. I liked a couple of her solo tracks and I do like 1.0s album, I just prefer Heidi to be honest, I think she was a well timed imposter.

Those that followed not so much.

It's a travesty that the 3 desperados as they are now are allowed to tarnish the previously good name of the Sugababes.”

desporadoes?

they've been brought in by management.

i think it's harsh to call people that, especially jade, who's just furthering her career.
TylerTango
11-08-2010
Is it wrong that I keep coming back to this thread just to lol at Quiche's dancing?
delectable
11-08-2010
Originally Posted by Dizagaox:
“I think it's ridiculous that people take issue with them using the Sugababes name.

Let's say they used another name, they would be considered one of the best girlbands around anywhere. Why get so worked up over a name?”

Lol
Unigal07
11-08-2010
Originally Posted by james-dean:
“desporadoes?

they've been brought in by management.

i think it's harsh to call people that, especially jade, who's just furthering her career.”

Furthering her career? She had a bright future, she's got a great voice and apparently (I haven't heard any of them) recorded some great tracks. Yet she sold out for a quick pass to fame to be part of a popular girl group.

Didn't wash with the public, did it?
Dizagaox
11-08-2010
Originally Posted by Star_Bright:
“I highly doubt that.”

Okay, let's just compare these:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vg9KQPRgllA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWk0RUng8-A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXJO2h4lhcI

to their peers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t08o1hfe1C4 (lip-sync'd btw)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AtlLzewpkU (kinda live)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqLxTRUOuCA (awful)

(Girls Aloud are dead, and PCD are M.I.A.)
Sweet FA
11-08-2010
The most incredible Sugababes "live" performance EVAR!
Originally Posted by Dizagaox:
“http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gt0CANqAJWw

”

Erm, for me that's the best Sugababes song EVER performed by the 2 members who will always be known as the true essence of the group, with their trademark edgy harmonies. Not sure what you hear when you click - so what if they're singing to the recorded version? Any idiot can tell they're still singing live!

I've had to bookmark that now, therefore mission failed!!!
Star_Bright
11-08-2010
Originally Posted by Dizagaox:
“Okay, let's just compare these:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vg9KQPRgllA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWk0RUng8-A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXJO2h4lhcI

to their peers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t08o1hfe1C4 (lip-sync'd btw)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6AtlLzewpkU (kinda live)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqLxTRUOuCA (awful)

(Girls Aloud are dead, and PCD are M.I.A.)”

That's like saying Mussolini wasn't so bad because Stalin and Hitler died first.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map