I was (and may still) write a thread about the HUGE differences between the dif housemates actions tonight, but here's a brief summary:
- Emma and Marco, did they do wrong> Yeah, on a social and cohabitation level, but even then, they responded to the fact that they were being lied and manipulated, if you look at what they actually did, it wasnt at all severe, i mean marco DANCES in front of jay, THAT's it... Emma responded to Victors aggression and he simply replied with more...
- Jay and Victor have actually committed criminal offences tonight, assault and in vic's case also battery. He threw wine over Emma, he threw nadia accross the room, that is wrong. Fact is these guys acted like complete idiots cos they realised they'd been discovered for what they really were, and then they blow their tops over it. Jay responded with threatening to kill marco cos he DANCED in front of him... how can anyoen justify jason's response!? And Victor? Well he's a dick head, and he's proven it beyond any doubt. Both are bad losers, people in this thread have said "it wouldnt have happened had Marco and Emma not been immature and childish" but that's like saying a wife deserves a beating 'cos she doesnt prepare a meal on time one day, or a child deserves to be slapped about cos he cries, what im getting at is that the responses are in no way justified by the catalys, no fkn way! If anything, none of this would have ahppened had they not been so deceitful! They have broken the law, acted like right fools, and couldnt take the heat so they exploded, FUK THEM!
k.