• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Just a warning
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
SULLA
17-06-2004
Originally Posted by rachelb65:
“and how do you think BB would give this warning

marco you have your 1st warning for dancing and laughing at jason”

add............in a provocative manner.
mr_ray
17-06-2004
Thank god Marco didn't do the dance to YMCA or things would have REALLY got bad in there.
chocolatekisses
17-06-2004
what about encitement - is that even a word?

or should it be enticement in marcos case!
mr_ray
17-06-2004
Originally Posted by justice4ratboy:
“what about encitement - is that even a word?

or should it be enticement in marcos case!”

I call in enjoying himself in non-offensive manner. It's not his fault if Jason decided to flip out because his sly cheating tactics had let him down.
poshpaws
17-06-2004
Thank god Marco didn't do the dance to YMCA or things would have REALLY got bad in there. Quote mr_ray


Nice one they had the cowboy the policeman and the indian to name but a few........................maybe that should be the next wake up call
chocolatekisses
17-06-2004
i don't like jason much but i don't like food fights either.

i was just trying to think of reasons for giving them ALL warnings - just so it's fair

Ahmed could get one for wearing beige socks.
Scruffy git
17-06-2004
Originally Posted by johnbuk:
“It seems this board is full of people who think that dancing in front of someone, and smiling, means its okay for that person to get physical and threaten to physically harm.”

I'd have punched the mincing git right in the gob.
That's just me though...
lnp
17-06-2004
Assuming Jason's got one warning. Are the producers saying that Jason can kick off like that another two times before getting ejected? If that is the case then that is not good for the programme.

The others are not saints either before anyone mentions it.
Scruffy git
17-06-2004
Originally Posted by lnp:
“Assuming Jason's got one warning. Are the producers saying that Jason can kick off like that another two times before getting ejected? If that is the case then that is not good for the programme.

The others are not saints either before anyone mentions it.”

The others are hardly saints...
rgs_uk
17-06-2004
Marco put the hose through the window of the snug room and sprayed Vic, Jason and Stuart with water repeatedly until BB asked HMs not to use the hose inside the house.

Although they took it is good humour (considering how they were feeling) legally I think that constitutes a physical assault if someone wants to pursue it

Add several hours of continuous noise, plus Marco taunting Jason repeatedly (looking at the clip I'm not at all sure Marco wasn't doing 'up and down' hand movements as part of his 'dance') and them trashing the place where they all have to live for the next two months and it is hardly surprising Jason cracked in the end. Still not excusable, what he said tho. Thuggish...
Scruffy git
17-06-2004
Originally Posted by rgs_uk:
“Add several hours of continuous noise, plus Marco taunting Jason repeatedly and them trashing the place where they have to live for the next two months and it is hardly surprising Jason cracked in the end. Still not excusable, what he said tho.”

He could have exercised a bit more self-control. The big winner in all this is Ahmed. While the Jungle cats are fighting with the Harem he's got a "get out of being up for eviction" pass until they all get sorted with each other.
robbies_gal
17-06-2004
victr would be on three if he got onetoday
1 for tlaking noms
2. for going up onthe roof
3. for being aggressive

so 3 and your out right? a good way ogf getting rid of someone tomorrow and not kicking out everyone involved witht he fight
Scruffy git
17-06-2004
Originally Posted by gabbyevs:
“so 3 and your out right?”

Absolutely no evidence of that. Three strikes and out was part of last yr's rules...
5th Horseman
17-06-2004
Originally Posted by Scruffy git:
“Absolutely no evidence of that. Three strikes and out was part of last yr's rules...”

Quite right, anyway Kitten broke 8 rules out of nine and several on more than one occassion, so I guess how many warnings is irrelevant, it may be once BB/C4/Endemol decide that the actions of a housemante are becoming boring/tedious/dangerous/etc then they will be ejected.
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map