• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
BB5 should cancel all further nominations to ensure fair play!
mybol_zaritchin
17-06-2004
I believe that because of the two factions (plus Ahmed) that now exist in the house. BB should no longer allow the HM's to make any further nominations. It's obvious who is going to be nominated for eviction for the next 4 or 5 weeks.

So, to keep BB interesting. BB should adopt a BB USA style of nomination whereby the HM's are set individual tasks or games and the loser(s) are put up for eviction.

This way the 'Jungle Cats' might have a chance of remaining in the house with the 'Chimpanzees' and a good mix of HM's will always remain in the house!

What do you think?
mybol_zaritchin
17-06-2004
Are the evictions taking place this Friday?
Judge Dread
17-06-2004
How about a straight public vote for your favourite, the lowest number of votes gets evicted - just like "I'm a Celebrity".

That would sort it.
fishfood
17-06-2004
Yeah I think they should put everyone up for eviction for the next 3 or 4 weeks, then when it thins out go back to nominations.
moogester
17-06-2004
Originally Posted by Judge Dread:
“How about a straight public vote for your favourite, the lowest number of votes gets evicted - just like "I'm a Celebrity".

That would sort it.”

That would take some of the uniqueness of BB away, but I can't think of another way that would be fairer
thenetworkbabe
17-06-2004
Put another way they now have Marco and Nadia who will team with Michelle, Stuart and possibly Dan to try and remove everyone else. Then they may have an assessment that Marco and Nadia are the two people left most likely to crack or provoke another flare up Thats pretty undeniable after Nadia and the Cigarettes and Nadia and Marco last night. They have to do something ito get a safer house in the unlikely event the show continues. Stopping this wek's eviction might change the voting strengths but might not keep it that way. They have to do something.

Put simply Shell, Vanessa, possibly Jason, Dan, stuart and Michelle is a safe enough BB to continue and has everyone potentially paired off with a choice who to vote for. Add a few safe newcomers for some more options.

Leave Marco and Nadia in there and something could go horribly wrong again.
Mirage
17-06-2004
Originally Posted by fishfood:
“Yeah I think they should put everyone up for eviction for the next 3 or 4 weeks, then when it thins out go back to nominations.”

Thank goodness I don't have any faves this year or I would be bankrupt with all the phoning in. I always worry my fave might leave, so I always have to do "just one more vote to be sure".
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map