Originally Posted by fab cesc:
“It might be good for them individually but turning on each other wouldn't make them a better alliance. Would Boogie turning on Will in All-Stars have made Chilltown a better alliance as that's the only way he would have been in with a chance of winning? Luckily Erika did it for him.”
Boogie didn't have to turn on Will, they were a two person alliance, they could both make the Final 2, yeah Will would have always beaten Boogie, but at least it was possible for Boogie to have a chance. Brigade is four members, two of them have no chance at winning.
Quote:
“They'd only have a much better chance against a non Brigade member in the final if they didn't have to screw their alliance to get there.”
They don't have to screw each other, they could do what they have been doing, and get someone else to do the dirty work for them.
Quote:
“Besides I think a Brigade final 4 is great for someone like Hayden who is likeable and won't be the main target, its bad for Lane as he can't win and it would be bad for Matt as he would be the first out unless he wins something. No idea about Enzo but its probably good for him.”
That's exactly what I'm saying. It's only good for half of them. As an alliance, making it to Final 4 is a great acomplishment, but each individual player it's different, for two of them its going to work, but the other two, it will fail.
Quote:
“I agree that she was by far the better player but she knew going into the show that the people who were voted out would not be sequested so should have adjusted how she played accordingly.”
But Will won the year before, and he was just as candid in the DR. She played an excellent game, and thought she'd be rewarded for it, just like Will was the year previously.