• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Ah it wasn't that bad.
anagoge
17-06-2004
Was expecting more actually.
thenetworkbabe
17-06-2004
Yes it was. You couldn't show that degree of violence and upset with people acting it. C4 deserves what it is going to get.
kahio-x
17-06-2004
It was bad but i agree that the sound and no image of teh live feed made it all much worse. The editing seemed to be pretty precise, leaving out some things for obvious reasons (the production team obviously decided not to show the "black" comment because of what we've experienced on the boards today no doubt, and they probably saw it wasn't made with any recist intent), and they chose not to actually SHOW Vanessa pouncing on nadia even though it was clear from the sound that she did, because the public would be confused on how to react at seeing nadia, and ex man, probably defending herself.

Still, i agree that it wasnt THAT bad, still some mayor counts of assault (in the technical sense) happening though, Jay deserved more than a warning...

k.
Alrightmate
17-06-2004
But I agree with anagoge,....

....It was bad in some ways,..in fact VERY bad..lol.

But last night people on the forum were saying housemate X should be kicked out.
But there was actually no real violence. Pushing and shoving, but no physical blows.
The most physically violent thing I saw was Emma throwing a metal tray at Victor, and Victor responding by throwing it back at her.
And maybe a couple of them shoving each other around.

The threat of violence is there though,..and I think that's what the problem is for the show.

Last night the text questions on screen were fairly disgusting....
...."Does Victor deserve to be kicked out?"
...."Can Victor be forgiven?"
...."Was Victor's behaviour too excessive"

All the text questions were about VICTOR.
About six housemates were all going at each other,....and for most of the time Victor was trying to see the funny side of things and put on a brave face,...e.g...getting drenched in water by Emma.
Or Victor was trying to calm it down.

Those text questions on CH4 were pretty disgusting by trying to pin the blame solely on Victor. They must have given a very false impression of events, and no doubt influenced some people's perception of events.

Bearing in mind though, that there MAY have been physical blows,....but we didn't get to see them.
anagoge
17-06-2004
I didn't say they were acting. I said it wasn't as bad as it was made out to be, due to the complete cut-off and police involvement. No one got hit. I was under the assumption there was at least a major assault.
Ezenden
17-06-2004
Originally Posted by kahio-x:
“It was bad but i agree that the sound and no image of teh live feed made it all much worse. The editing seemed to be pretty precise, leaving out some things for obvious reasons (the production team obviously decided not to show the "black" comment because of what we've experienced on the boards today no doubt, and they probably saw it wasn't made with any recist intent), and they chose not to actually SHOW Vanessa pouncing on nadia even though it was clear from the sound that she did, because the public would be confused on how to react at seeing nadia, and ex man, probably defending herself.

Still, i agree that it wasnt THAT bad, still some mayor counts of assault (in the technical sense) happening though, Jay deserved more than a warning...

k.”

Just because that maybe your opinion, doesnt it mean it is probable that C4 edited for that reason. Plain arrogance. You have as little clue as i do. And whether THEY think it wasnt meant to be racist or not, should be completly irrelevant in deciding whether to show it or not.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map