DS Forums

 
 

Is FreeSat a good alternative?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21-08-2010, 15:03
Faust
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 8,098

Simply a query not a criticism. Is FreeSat a good alternative to someone who is not really benefiting from the Sky package and thinking of leaving, I mean that question to be as opposed to Freeview? I have noticed that there seems to be a number of channels on Freeview that are missing from the FreeSat lineup and wondered why? Is FreeSat not getting the support required from the broadcasters, if not why not and does all bode well for the future.

One further thing - the channels that don't start on Freeview until 6 or 7 pm each day, is that the case on FreeSat or are they showing 24/7?
Faust is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 21-08-2010, 15:24
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,783
This seems a strange question from someone with so many posts?, as it's been 'done to death' endlessly here.

Channels aren't on Freesat for a couple of reasons:

1) There's no available space on 2D, where most FTA channels need to go.

2) There's no financial advantage for them to do so.

Freesat is doing EXACTLY as it's supposed to do, it's giving another option for areas where they get no Freeview, or only Freeview Lite - it was never intended as an alternative to Freeview.

If you want a recorder, and you don't want Sky subscription channels, then Freesat is the way to go. If you don't need a recorder (and really EVERYONE does), then an ex-Sky box and FTV card will give you a number of extra channels not on Freesat.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-08-2010, 15:34
NewWorldMan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,190
Whether it's a good alternative? I would say work out which channels on Sky that you are currently watching that you absolutely must continue to watch on the alternative platform.

There is a long thread in the Freesat forum discussing this, so take a look. Also note what Nigel Goodwin, one of the most knowledgeable people here, has just said.

Which channels only start at 6 on Freeview? IIRC, Russia Today is part-time but what are the others?
NewWorldMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-08-2010, 15:38
davemurgatroyd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Oxford
Posts: 12,689
Freesat and Freeview have widely different channel line-ups (besides the PSBs and their siblings) and are likely to be so for quite a while. This is down to on Freeview the cost of launching new channels and the transmission chain together with the lack of bandwidth and on freesat this is down to the lack of suitable bandwidth on UK spot beam transponders for the FTA channels that are very likely to have "rights issues" broadcasting on pan European beams and is not likely to be eased until new satellites come on line in 2 or 3 years. For best coverage of free UK TV then a combination of both freesat (or FreesatFromSky in your case with your existing Sky HD box) and Freeview is recommended. From your other posts you do not seem enamoured of HD and are looking for a PVR so an SD Freeview+ PVR would seem the best choice for you at a cost of around £90 upwards. Freeview+ gives similar series link facilities to Sky+. There are no SD freesat PVRs at present and twin tuner PVRs are around £200 upwards.
davemurgatroyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-08-2010, 18:53
Faust
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 8,098
This seems a strange question from someone with so many posts?, as it's been 'done to death' endlessly here.

Channels aren't on Freesat for a couple of reasons:

1) There's no available space on 2D, where most FTA channels need to go.

2) There's no financial advantage for them to do so.

Freesat is doing EXACTLY as it's supposed to do, it's giving another option for areas where they get no Freeview, or only Freeview Lite - it was never intended as an alternative to Freeview.

If you want a recorder, and you don't want Sky subscription channels, then Freesat is the way to go. If you don't need a recorder (and really EVERYONE does), then an ex-Sky box and FTV card will give you a number of extra channels not on Freesat.
I may have a lot of postings Nigel but to be honest this is only about the second time I have visited the FreeSat forum. Thanks for the info though.
Faust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-08-2010, 18:58
Faust
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 8,098
Whether it's a good alternative? I would say work out which channels on Sky that you are currently watching that you absolutely must continue to watch on the alternative platform.

There is a long thread in the Freesat forum discussing this, so take a look. Also note what Nigel Goodwin, one of the most knowledgeable people here, has just said.

Which channels only start at 6 on Freeview? IIRC, Russia Today is part-time but what are the others?
There appear to be a number of part time channels - Virgin etc.

Between the Wife and I we only currently have two progs from Sky in our Planner. Nearly everything we watch is from the terrestrial channels our two planners are testament to that.
Faust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-08-2010, 19:09
dice
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 590
I may have a lot of postings Nigel but to be honest this is only about the second time I have visited the FreeSat forum. Thanks for the info though.
At a guess, he's probably surprised that someone as active as you've been hadn't thought to perform a search before posting this question (especially as similar threads to this one are easy to find).
dice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-08-2010, 22:46
Faust
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 8,098
At a guess, he's probably surprised that someone as active as you've been hadn't thought to perform a search before posting this question (especially as similar threads to this one are easy to find).
Ah well there you go! You see I did try to do a search but for some reason I kept getting the swirling circle followed by a timed out message so assumed there was a fault with the site hence my post.
Faust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-08-2010, 23:29
c4rv
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Essex
Posts: 16,218
AFAIK, freesat is a EPG to unencrypted channels on the same sats used by sky. Sky do a card for one-off £20 allowing you access to a large number of channels using your sky box.

Channel lists here,

http://www.ukfree.tv/allchannels.php
c4rv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 06:04
M60
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The great North of England!
Posts: 3,902
One channel currently available on Freeview and not Freesat (for today only now!) is Sky Sports News which as we know leaves today or tomorrow. Sky News, Sky 3, Channel One (to be) and Fiver + Five USA are the channels that are also not available on Freesat. For me it's no great loss as all of the above show dross anyway. Sky News is easily substituted by the excellent BBC News which does a better more unbiased job and with iPlayer, soon to be ITV Player Freesat+ beats an SD Sky box hands down, even more so that the greedy lot at $ky disable your Sky+ functionality after subscription lapses thus effectively rendering the box useless for recording... great!!
M60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 08:57
baarree
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Amsterdam.
Posts: 255
But what is the point of freesat HD when one of its main founders is only showing their HD programs on sky, a bit of a slap in the face for the freesat fans?
baarree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 21:32
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,783
But what is the point of freesat HD when one of its main founders is only showing their HD programs on sky, a bit of a slap in the face for the freesat fans?
Who would this supposed 'main founder' be?), there are only two, and both have HD channels on Freesat.

Freesat is crippled by it's FTA nature, which is why other free HD channels can't launch on it.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-08-2010, 21:47
spiney2
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24,103
Specifically, James Murdoch is "waging war" with the BBC ........ (and uk public service broadcasting, more generally).
spiney2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2010, 01:12
M60
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The great North of England!
Posts: 3,902
Who would this supposed 'main founder' be?), there are only two, and both have HD channels on Freesat.

Freesat is crippled by it's FTA nature, which is why other free HD channels can't launch on it.
Once the cost of HD transmission is more affordable and/or advertising markets improve together with Freesat penetration more channels won't need the support of the greedy mits who are $ky.
M60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2010, 08:28
baarree
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Amsterdam.
Posts: 255
It was always obvious from the very inception of this product that true freesat was going to fail, copyrights will simply not allow it to broadcast openly to everybody in Europe. If it had gone down the free to view road it would have been a whole different ball game.
baarree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2010, 08:41
Nigel Goodwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,783
Once the cost of HD transmission is more affordable and/or advertising markets improve together with Freesat penetration more channels won't need the support of the greedy mits who are $ky.
And has no bearing whatsoever on the requirements for FTA transmissions on Freesat - and Freesat will only ever be a minority service anyway, which is what it's there for.
Nigel Goodwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2010, 22:52
finbaar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,918
It was always obvious from the very inception of this product that true freesat was going to fail, copyrights will simply not allow it to broadcast openly to everybody in Europe. If it had gone down the free to view road it would have been a whole different ball game.
Well who knows what the future holds but it's doing fantastic work at the moment
finbaar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2010, 00:05
freeshat
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 443
the excellent BBC News which does a better more unbiased job
BBC news is far from excellent and unbiased.

It still seems to hold torches for Tony Bliar and Mr Browns looney left government.

The BBC local news programs are just a joke.
freeshat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2010, 07:19
M60
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The great North of England!
Posts: 3,902
BBC news is far from excellent and unbiased.

It still seems to hold torches for Tony Bliar and Mr Browns looney left government.

The BBC local news programs are just a joke.
Do you blame them when the Conservatives seem hell-bent on breaking up the BBC and handing it on a plate to the Pro-Murdoch Satellite monopoly. If you think Sky News is unbiased then your very much mistaken!
M60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2010, 08:51
baarree
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Amsterdam.
Posts: 255
I know some people on here try to convince themselves that freesat is a success, to others it is obvious that it is not expanding its channel line as it promised, due to its own stubborn self imposed limitations, and company's like Sky are exploiting the situation.
baarree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2010, 09:49
Jepson
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,089
I know some people on here try to convince themselves that freesat is a success
No real convincing to be done.

It does exactly what it set out to do and does it extremely well.

It's only people who thought it was going to be some sort of 'Free Sky' who are disappointed.

Well done, Freesat. Just keep doing what you're currently doing and plenty of people will be very happy with you.
Jepson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2010, 10:36
baarree
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Amsterdam.
Posts: 255
It promised more channels and they have not arrived, and the HD bit of freesat is a joke when ITV take their share to SKY what hope of any others have we. And I do not think anyone expected it to compete with Sky, just the channels that are free on Sky and Freeview!
baarree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2010, 10:45
Jepson
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,089
It promised more channels and they have not arrived, and the HD bit of freesat is a joke when ITV take their share to SKY what hope of any others have we. And I do not think anyone expected it to compete with Sky, just the channels that are free on Sky and Freeview!
Well, if people bought it on the basis of a vague 'cake tomorrow' promise it's not surprising they are going to be disappointed.

If Freesat had said that x, y, and z channels were coming in 3 months that would have been a different matter.

Having said that, they have pretty much doubled the number of hours of HD from startup and that will go up by another 50% quite soon so it's not exactly as if there has been no movement there.

Overall, an extremely good service for those who are not total TV addicts.
Jepson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2010, 13:08
victorslot
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 533
Well, if people bought it on the basis of a vague 'cake tomorrow' promise it's not surprising they are going to be disappointed.

If Freesat had said that x, y, and z channels were coming in 3 months that would have been a different matter.

Having said that, they have pretty much doubled the number of hours of HD from startup and that will go up by another 50% quite soon so it's not exactly as if there has been no movement there.

Overall, an extremely good service for those who are not total TV addicts.
I agree with you Jepson I love Freesat, I have 2 Freesat TV's and a PVR to prove the point, however my feeling before buying into it was that it would provide what was generally available on Freeview for those without a good Freeview signal. Now I'm not saying that was how the promotion was worded but that was the impression gained. So I would hope that they will retain all the main channels that Freeview do.
victorslot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2010, 13:15
derek500
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 20,371
If Freesat had said that x, y, and z channels were coming in 3 months that would have been a different matter.
Likewise they don't know if channels are going to leave. They're at the mercy of the broadcasters.

It's a gamble you take when choosing a platform.

People have bought Freeview and have lost Sky Sports News, it's not Freeview's fault.

If ITV2/3/4, E4 and More4 go pay, it won't be Freesat's fault
derek500 is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:29.