|
||||||||
X Factor admits to vocal tweaks |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,698
|
X Factor admits to vocal tweaks
X factor bosses have admitted to using auto tuning for the previous show. According to the BBC.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-11056050 Apparently it's because the microphones weren't working. LOL |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Middesbrough (via Manchester)
Posts: 37,343
|
The microphones weren't working... but sound came out of them and they autotuned it? Eh?!
It's bollocks. I have no idea why they done it to begin with. They probably wanted it to be more "glamorous". |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Watford
Posts: 15,815
|
I just find it hilarious how X Factor fans are getting so annoyed at this auto-tune thing. What do they expect? We all know genuine talent is the last thing Cowell is interested in. Thought everyone knew that by now, so why is anyone surprised or 'outraged'? There's just no telling some people...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,905
|
Cowell's excuse no doubt will be that 'everyone in the business uses autotune and backing vocals, we just want to give the contestants the real experience'.
I have to agree with kutox though. The X Factor never was a credible singing competition, it's manufactured to the very core...so I don't see why people are surprised that the vocals are tampered with. I thought the amount of vocal 'aid' last year was obvious. I mean, some acts - i.e. Jedward/Olly etc. had so much backing track that they didn't even need to sing for the song to be heard. If the outrage translates to the show being boycotted, wonderful, but it won't, so... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London
Posts: 4,901
|
It's just show-biz - nothing to get upset about. Plus just about every record these days uses auto-tune to some degree, even Michael Buble who can sing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,408
|
Quote:
It's just show-biz - nothing to get upset about. Plus just about every record these days uses auto-tune to some degree, even Michael Buble who can sing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,998
|
I don't really see why anyone would be surprised by this, there's always something that annoys X Factor fans (as in the ones that take the show seriously) every year and every year they say "that's it I'm never watching the show again" but they always go back and watch it religiously and buy whatever crap comes out of it. Simon and co can do what they want and get away with it as long as the punters keep viewing the show and buying the records. Quote:
I think most people can understand autotune being used to a certain extent on studio albums, that isn't the issue. But when you're using it LIVE on a so-called TALENT competition, then that's just disgraceful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 20,806
|
Quote:
I think most people can understand autotune being used to a certain extent on studio albums, that isn't the issue. But when you're using it LIVE on a so-called TALENT competition, then that's just disgraceful.
They tweaked it in the studio. You can't really use auto tune on a live perfromance unless you are just using it as a special effect. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Kylie Minogue's Bedroom.
Posts: 4,354
|
does anyone no if simon cowell has confirmed weather he is going to release all thier performances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the sofa with my laptop.
Posts: 32,605
|
As a pitch corrector to rectify the odd bum note in a recording session to save having to record it all over again it's fine.
Saves money on expensive studio time. But tweaking it to such a degree that the vocals sound robotic is just ridiculous to me. Why do people want singers to sound robotic???? ![]() I watched Glee to see what all the fuss was about and the vocals on that are autotuned to the nth degree. I couldn't bear it. And for me the whole point of watching X Factor is to cringe at the tuneless delusional 'singers' - so if their bum notes are going to be pitch corrected so much that they all sound like Marvin the Paranoid Android then why bother to watch? |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London
Posts: 4,901
|
Quote:
I think most people can understand autotune being used to a certain extent on studio albums, that isn't the issue. But when you're using it LIVE on a so-called TALENT competition, then that's just disgraceful.
It's micro-managed TV entertainment to make money for Simon who I'd wager already knows who the winner is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,653
|
Seems to me that this has just been done to provoke a bit of a reaction, get a few headlines and boost viewing figures - which I'm sure it will succeed in doing.
Surely no-one took the X Factor seriously as a talent show anyway? |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,408
|
Quote:
But is the X-Factor a genuine talent competition? I don't think so - if it were would you really have the likes of Danni, Cheryl and Geri (and Louis for that matter) judging?
It's micro-managed TV entertainment to make money for Simon who I'd wager already knows who the winner is. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 15,749
|
I wonder if they have an auto-tune which makes people's voices terrible! They seem to have used it on Saturday.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 17,413
|
It mightn't have been so bad if the autotune wasn't stuck in "Britney Spears' - Piece of Me" mode. They all sounded so robotic. Total cringe
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,417
|
Quote:
You can't really use auto tune on a live perfromance unless you are just using it as a special effect.
It is also incredibly expensive, as it requires a dedicated live sound engineer just with the autotune deck. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the sofa with my laptop.
Posts: 32,605
|
Here is when autotune works....
watch the first report [ approx 1.02 in ] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzNhaLUT520 and then see it autotuned.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKsVSBhSwJg If Simon sees this do you think he'd sign the guy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 1,694
|
It was all just a publicity stunt, comeon you need special equipment / configurations for autotune
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,594
|
Quote:
Here is when autotune works....
watch the first report [ approx 1.02 in ] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzNhaLUT520 and then see it autotuned.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKsVSBhSwJg If Simon sees this do you think he'd sign the guy? ![]() ![]() Wow, that's amazing! I had no idea you could LITERALLY make a melody out of normal speech The effects people have nowadays is truly remarkable. That sounded like the guy had orginally sung it, you would never know he was just talking. Makes you think, if you can do it with a news report, could people just talk the lyrics in a studio, and the make it into a song.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the sofa with my laptop.
Posts: 32,605
|
Quote:
![]() Wow, that's amazing! I had no idea you could LITERALLY make a melody out of normal speech The effects people have nowadays is truly remarkable. That sounded like the guy had orginally sung it, you would never know he was just talking. Makes you think, if you can do it with a news report, could people just talk the lyrics in a studio, and the make it into a song.So a tool which was developed to save time re recording the occasional 'sour' note in a recording session has now been used for this. And to make people who are always out of tune sound in tune. Wonder if it could work on Jedward though? Maybe that IS stretching technology too far?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Up North.
Posts: 21,867
|
I simply think that we should be allowed to see and hear what the judges see and hear. That's all I expect from The X Factor and shows like it - I am fully aware that most of it is scripted, staged and manufactured, but I honestly would have thought we'd be able to hear the singers' real voices. We're supposed to be voting for them, we deserve to know how they really sound.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the sofa with my laptop.
Posts: 32,605
|
Quote:
I simply think that we should be allowed to see and hear what the judges see and hear. That's all I expect from The X Factor and shows like it - I am fully aware that most of it is scripted, staged and manufactured, but I honestly would have thought we'd be able to hear the singers' real voices. We're supposed to be voting for them, we deserve to know how they really sound.
Exactly. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:21.


