|
||||||||
The Ratings Thread (Part 11) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#2976 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 948
|
I just dont get ITV and there drama policy.
There 9pm success in the past has always been built on mass audience dramas that can return every year as 12 parters (eg London Burning, Peak Practice, Soldier Soldier, Bad Girls), and have a loyal audience as they become part of the tv land scape. Now looking at there recent drama commissions, there is very few dramas that fit in this mould. They seem very much dramas that could possibly return for 4 episodes a year, and dont really have a premise that could last for 10 years. There main chance was L&O: UK, and instead of trying to build it an audience by showing a block of 12 episodes, they divide the series up and move it around. If they had shown it in a block of 12 episodes it shows a message to the audience that they have confidence in the series, and to some extent watching a show is a habit. I dont know how to explain this to make sense. Look at BBC dramas, they all have a premise, but they are backgrounds to some extent to the drama. So look at spooks, the basis is a spy drama, but there is so much you can do within this to be able to produce 10+ episodes a year, for 10 years, this is exactly in the wein of the old ITV dramas. New ITV dramas have such a small defined premise that the premise is the story, and once it is done you cant expand it, without it seeming a totally different show. I hope that makes sense. |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2977 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,940
|
invisipost
|
|
|
|
|
#2978 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
|
Quote:
Yet not switching to Emmerdale which is languishing in the lower six millions, imo poor. Unfortunate for ITV.
IMO Emmerdale has been the success story of the year for ITV-when everything else has decreased on ITV1, Emmerdale has increased hugely both in ratings and quality for a show that was dying a couple of years ago and continues to provide a great lead in for Corrie and boosts the otherwise weak Tuesdays and often Wednesdays. I can count the number of times Emmerdale has fallen below 6m in normal circumstances on one hand. Something which couldn't be said this time last year. It's recovered from an extremely weak period.I don't think there is much crossover audience between TOS and Emmerdale. TOS has a lot of casual viewers who just watch if they are at home, but wouldn't make an effort to watch. |
|
|
|
|
#2979 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 16,967
|
Quote:
Emmerdale's rating is poor?
IMO Emmerdale has been the success story of the year for ITV-when everything else has decreased on ITV1, Emmerdale has increased hugely both in ratings and quality for a show that was dying a couple of years ago and continues to provide a great lead in for Corrie and boosts the otherwise weak Tuesdays and often Wednesdays. I can count the number of times Emmerdale has fallen below 6m in normal circumstances on one hand. Something which couldn't be said this time last year. It's recovered from an extremely weak period.I don't think there is much crossover audience between TOS and Emmerdale. TOS has a lot of casual viewers who just watch if they are at home, but wouldn't make an effort to watch. |
|
|
|
|
#2980 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cymru
Posts: 12,702
|
Quote:
I suppose you're right that the weeknight 9pm ratings for last week were similar to last year.
Quote:
I dread to think how much Merlin's rating will drop this week, with no Strictly and starting the same time as X Factor. I don't get it - the BBC must spend a bomb on it, but they don't seem to support it at all. I would have thought they could forget the repeat of Hole in the Wall and bump everything half an hour earlier so that Merlin at least some start on X Factor.
Quote:
I just dont get ITV and there drama policy.
There 9pm success in the past has always been built on mass audience dramas that can return every year as 12 parters (eg London Burning, Peak Practice, Soldier Soldier, Bad Girls), and have a loyal audience as they become part of the tv land scape. ... I dont know how to explain this to make sense. In a way ITV is now suffering for it's past glories. OK, no new series launched in the last few years has worked out for them, but before that in the early part of the decade ITV were having much success with their one-off "drama premieres" and their various two-parters - but none of these translated into returnable series. So although in the short term they were pulling in the ratings and getting critical acclaim, at the time the BBC were bringing in new shows such as Spooks, Hustle, Waking the Dead etc. which turned out to have many years of life in them. |
|
|
|
#2981 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,469
|
Quote:
Emmerdale's rating is poor?
IMO Emmerdale has been the success story of the year for ITV-when everything else has decreased on ITV1, Emmerdale has increased hugely both in ratings and quality for a show that was dying a couple of years ago and continues to provide a great lead in for Corrie and boosts the otherwise weak Tuesdays and often Wednesdays. I can count the number of times Emmerdale has fallen below 6m in normal circumstances on one hand. Something which couldn't be said this time last year. It's recovered from an extremely weak period.I don't think there is much crossover audience between TOS and Emmerdale. TOS has a lot of casual viewers who just watch if they are at home, but wouldn't make an effort to watch. |
|
|
|
|
#2982 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 30,110
|
I think it has been clear for a while that, thanks to The Apprentice having to move and the decision to hold New Tricks back, BBC1 were going to have a stronger 4th quarter than last year. And that ITV, without Benidorm and Doc Martin were bound to struggle more.
Based on their recent decisions, I'm not sure that ITV can afford drama that rates much below 5m. The only positive from the week was Paul O'Grady who is doing exactly what would have been hoped for. 3.5m against tough opposition on a difficult night at low cost. What I would have liked to see ITV do is a proper "premiere week". Launch The X Factor in the first weekend of September and within that, heavily promote the new line-up. Instead of 30 second trailers at the start and end of ad breaks, just do full 60 second trailers that tell us a bit more. Have recognisable talent in the new series - and send them around promoting endlessly. Monday - Crime procedurals Tuesday - Factual Wednesday - Football Thursday - 2 Sitcoms Friday - Paul O'Grady Sunday - Serialised Drama All of them running around 10-12 episodes. And all arranged so as they can return in the same slots the next year - none of these 18 month gaps between series. When TV can be so hit-and-miss, it's not helpful when your "hits" end up being limited to 3 or 4 hours every 18 months. It also means that the channel won't build a strong image around them. |
|
|
|
|
#2983 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 16,967
|
As I've mentioned, away from the soaps( and Corrie isn't such a big hitter now), ITV1 only really gets high ratings for the Cowell shows and I'm A Celeb, but this fluctuates, last year it averaged 8 million, but the year before fell to 5 million, and a weak set of contestants could do it in this year. Also the format is getting stale and I can see it doing a BB and being finished.
Speaking of reality, ITV1 hasn't had much luck in recent years. Ladette to Lady is now in its death throes due to the format being ruined, All At Sea, Marco's Kitchen Burnout and possibly 71 Degrees North flopped and then there were real stinkers like WAGs Boutique and Love Island. |
|
|
|
|
#2984 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,788
|
Quote:
What I would have liked to see ITV do is a proper "premiere week". Launch The X Factor in the first weekend of September and within that, heavily promote the new line-up. Instead of 30 second trailers at the start and end of ad breaks, just do full 60 second trailers that tell us a bit more. Have recognisable talent in the new series - and send them around promoting endlessly.
Quote:
When TV can be so hit-and-miss, it's not helpful when your "hits" end up being limited to 3 or 4 hours every 18 months. It also means that the channel won't build a strong image around them.
I agree, the gaps between series of some of their popular shows are too long. Really, they ought to have recommissioned Benidorm for two series in one go because I can see there being a scenario after series 4 where there'll be another 18 months before a fifth series is on air. It gives the writer extra time to work on the fifth series even before the fourth one is on air so they can start production on it as soon as possible. I doubt Benidorm's ratings will fall to axing levels anytime soon. The same goes for some of their other shows too like Whitechapel which they took too long in renewing - ratings for that was so high in its first series that at this stage they should be developing a third one with production ready to go soon after the 2nd one airs even if the ratings drop to 6m. Of course, ITV probably haven't thought about doing that based on their track record.
|
|
|
|
|
#2985 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,571
|
Not really ratings related but I find it amazing that they make changes to a programme this late in the day, Quote:
Just recorded some last minute VO for tonight's #XFactor. Show tape is probably on a motorbike on its way to ITV's transmission suite
http://twitter.com/peterdickson
|
|
|
|
|
#2986 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Glasgow,Scotland
Posts: 3,666
|
Quote:
Not really ratings related but I find it amazing that they make changes to programme this late in the day,
http://twitter.com/peterdickson |
|
|
|
|
#2987 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 16,967
|
This really hasn't been ITV's year. Even the much touted ITV2 has shown such ratings flops as Jedward, The Saturdays 24.7 and Paris Hilton's New BFF( although my niece watches it) and is now falling behind BBC Three, which has a much more varied line up.
ITV's problems are complicated to fix. For all we would love to tell them to ditch all their crummy reality shows and extra Corrie episodes( and I would think a few staff would say the same), they know that these programmes are cheap and in the case of Corrie is a ratings banker. ITV is fighting for a diminshing share of the advertising cake and the days of them creating a series like The World At War are impossible to do on cost grounds. However, should ITV's decline be THAT important. For all it is the original commercial broadcaster and has an illustrious past, rather like Rover ,which once dominated the British car industry, it's producing a product that fewer people want and the quality is poor. For quality commercial television, Channel 4 does a far better job, then there are specialised sports and news channels whose coverage is light years ahead of ITV. ITV will go like Rover, some of it will survive under different management but the rest will go. |
|
|
|
|
#2988 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 30,110
|
Quote:
I like the idea but isn't this the sort of thing ITV did with 'Identity' and look how that worked out! Subsitute TXF for The World Cup and there were quite a lot of promos for Identity during that period, had recogniseable talent in Keeley Hawes, it launched well, but the ratings fell because it wasn't a particularly good show. Couldn't the same sort of thing happen here too, but it'd be even worse with 12 episodes? 12 episodes is great if the show is a hit but it's risky business, as we saw quite recently with Echo Beach bombing and stinking up their schedule for almost 3 months!
|
|
|
|
|
#2989 |
|
Guest
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,647
|
Quote:
I like the idea but isn't this the sort of thing ITV did with 'Identity' and look how that worked out! Subsitute TXF for The World Cup and there were quite a lot of promos for Identity during that period, had recogniseable talent in Keeley Hawes, it launched well, but the ratings fell because it wasn't a particularly good show. Couldn't the same sort of thing happen here too, but it'd be even worse with 12 episodes? 12 episodes is great if the show is a hit but it's risky business, as we saw quite recently with Echo Beach bombing and stinking up their schedule for almost 3 months!
I agree, the gaps between series of some of their popular shows are too long. Really, they ought to have recommissioned Benidorm for two series in one go because I can see there being a scenario after series 4 where there'll be another 18 months before a fifth series is on air. It gives the writer extra time to work on the fifth series even before the fourth one is on air so they can start production on it as soon as possible. I doubt Benidorm's ratings will fall to axing levels anytime soon. The same goes for some of their other shows too like Whitechapel which they took too long in renewing. Just on a basic scheduling level, a quick fix solution for ITV is to scrap their LWT style Friday entertainment slot completely and focus on Saturday and Sunday for entertainment. Airing murder mystery from 8-10pm on Friday is always a big draw, repeat or not, and they should consider moving their light entertainment shows to Sunday (Alan Carr's show works very well there) and any attempts at scripted comedies (so basically Benidorm ) to Thursday. Their biggest problem, as already mentioned, is their lack of returning dramas. I definitely think Bad Girls is one to consider recomissioning to get them back off the ground, I think it would do quite well considering it finished with quite good ratings. ITV don't really try to attempt them anymore though, they tend to focus on specials rather than series'. Collision, Father & Son and U Be Dead are recent examples of their successes, but they are few and far between and none of them have any recomission value. Collision could but it would be pushing it a bit and it would basically be the same thing. My final gripe with ITV (and Channel 4 for that matter) is their lack of responsivness fo successful digital shows. If BBC2/BBC3 gets a big hit, its promoted to BBC1 quite quickly where it becomes a massive TV show. Just one example of where ITV are going wrong here is Celebrity Juice. That got close to 1m viewers the other night and fits their outlook for what they're trying to achieve at the weekends with younger viewers. Why is it still airing on ITV2 when it could be getting them 3m+ (but crucially high in 16-34 year olds) on a Saturday/Sunday?! This problem is greater with Channel 4 though. I'm all for giving digital channels their own unique identity but digital channels should never overshadow their terrestrial counterpart. Channel 4 would probably be in a simiar position to how ITV1 currently rates if they stripped E4 of its successes. |
|
|
|
|
#2990 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Glasgow,Scotland
Posts: 3,666
|
Quote:
Moving Wallpaper and Echo Beach should never in a million years have played out on the same channel.
I'm all for giving digital channels their own unique identity but digital channels should never overshadow their terrestrial counterpart. Channel 4 would probably be in a simiar position to how ITV1 currently rates if they stripped E4 of its successes. I also agree about Channel 4, I'd say that 98% of what I watch on the CH4 franchise is E4, I only watch CH4 for CT,CDWM and The IT Crowd. |
|
|
|
|
#2991 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 30,110
|
Celebrity Juice probably would do well on ITV1 but I don't think it would be huge anyway. And there's also a high chance of it having to tone down if it moved to the main channel and followed The X Factor which is family viewing. The Daily Mail would have a fit at the sight of Michelle Keegan drinking Keith Lemon's cum at 9.15pm on a Saturday night.
And I generally disagree with stripping digital channels of their successes. Repeat them on the main channel by all means but first runs should remain on E4/ITV2 whatever. They're meant to be building these channels for a future where the flagship channels aren't so dominant. On the subject of Celebrity Juice, it's a really good show now. Sometimes these shows take time to build up recurring gags but they've got it working now. And despite the "Celebrity" title, it's the kind of thing that could even work on E4 because it's generally just taking the pi*s. |
|
|
|
|
#2992 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,524
|
Quote:
Speaking of reality, ITV1 hasn't had much luck in recent years. Ladette to Lady is now in its death throes due to the format being ruined (snip) and then there were real stinkers like WAGs Boutique and Love Island.
WAGs Boutique was ITV2 - again inisignificant. |
|
|
|
|
#2993 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: nr Peterborough, England
Posts: 48,127
|
Quote:
Celebrity Juice probably would do well on ITV1 but I don't think it would be huge anyway. And there's also a high chance of it having to tone down if it moved to the main channel and followed The X Factor which is family viewing. The Daily Mail would have a fit at the sight of Michelle Keegan drinking Keith Lemon's cum at 9.15pm on a Saturday night.
I didnt realise ITV 2 had gotten so low. |
|
|
|
|
#2994 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 30,110
|
Quote:
hang on, ive not seen this show, is that really what happens? The Daily Mail would be well within there rigts to throw a fit at that, and I may just join them.
I didnt realise ITV 2 had gotten so low. |
|
|
|
|
#2995 |
|
Guest
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,647
|
Quote:
Celebrity Juice probably would do well on ITV1 but I don't think it would be huge anyway. And there's also a high chance of it having to tone down if it moved to the main channel and followed The X Factor which is family viewing. The Daily Mail would have a fit at the sight of Michelle Keegan drinking Keith Lemon's cum at 9.15pm on a Saturday night.
And I generally disagree with stripping digital channels of their successes. Repeat them on the main channel by all means but first runs should remain on E4/ITV2 whatever. They're meant to be building these channels for a future where the flagship channels aren't so dominant. On the subject of Celebrity Juice, it's a really good show now. Sometimes these shows take time to build up recurring gags but they've got it working now. And despite the "Celebrity" title, it's the kind of thing that could even work on E4 because it's generally just taking the pi*s. Daily Mail would probably throw a fit, but all publicity is good publicity. The goddess they worship known as Holly Willoughby is on the show, so they might be a bit forgiving. But even if it doesn't ever make it to premiere on ITV1, they should definitely give it a rerun at some point in the week after the news at 10. |
|
|
|
|
#2996 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 5,294
|
Quote:
hang on, ive not seen this show, is that really what happens? The Daily Mail would be well within there rigts to throw a fit at that, and I may just join them.
I didnt realise ITV 2 had gotten so low. |
|
|
|
|
#2997 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 117,021
|
The funny thing is that ITV is probably debated more than any other channel on this thread and there are many good ideas about rejuvenating the channel, but they're not taken - why is that?
I'm wondering whether The X Factor/Britain's Got Talent sucks up so much of the budget that they can't afford to test long running dramas.Or whether they have lost their nerve after their disatrous slate of 2008 so they're steering well clear of long commissions in case it goes belly up again. Strip ITV of the soaps, the Cowell shows, Doc Martin and I'm A Celebrity and they would have nothing in terms of rating bankers. In comparison take EastEnders, Strictly Come Dancing, New Tricks, Doctor Who and Waking the Dead from BBC1 and they'd still have The One Show supporting the start of the evening, Merlin, Silent Witness, Spooks, Who Do You Think You Are, Have I Got News For You?...their programme slate is so much more stable. ITV need to take risks with long running shows. They also need to stabilise the soap schedule instead of having them chucked haphazardly around the schedules. The most annoying thing is ITV1 has the money and potential to provide good opposition to BBC1, but they're failing to fulfil this. Last night: New Tricks seems slightly on the low side but still did well. Paul O'Grady is doing his job for ITV. The second Coronation Street seems low but the first is in line with EastEnders which is ok in the current climate. |
|
|
|
|
#2998 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,836
|
C4 and Five need a flashsip show right now.
BBC1 has Eastenders, BBC2 has Top Gear/Mock The Week, ITV Has I'm A Celebrity, BGT and XF. To me, right now it seems to be Grand Designs for Channel 4... and Five hasn't had a flagship show in yonks!!! |
|
|
|
|
#2999 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,066
|
I laugh at people demanding that ITV 'take risks'. These would be the first who would find it hilarous when a new 12 part drama 'tanks' after week 2. It would be a talking point every week 'how long will ITV stick with this show in this slot?' etc.
ITV took a risk by axing a long running breakfast show. Look how that has turned out, and the reaction on here, it's now a stick to beat them with "ITV were idiots to axe GMTV" A lot of the ideas in this thread are constrained by 3 things - Money - Ideas that are easier said than done "They need more returning dramas" - you don't say - What other channels are doing at the same time. All the ideas don't consider BBC1 airing New Tricks in the same slot, or more damaging, a stripped drama. ITV1 and BBC1 also have the problem that every show has to be a mainstream hit, take comedy for example, they have to appeal to everyone and end up appealing to nobody. All the hit comedies that people rave about over the last few years (like The Inbetweeners) are cult hits that get 2 or 3 million. I would guess that Moving Wallpaper would still be running now had it been on BBC2 or Channel 4. |
|
|
|
|
#3000 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,940
|
Quote:
Their biggest problem, as already mentioned, is their lack of returning dramas. I definitely think Bad Girls is one to consider recomissioning to get them back off the ground, I think it would do quite well considering it finished with quite good ratings. ITV don't really try to attempt them anymore though, they tend to focus on specials rather than series'. Collision, Father & Son and U Be Dead are recent examples of their successes, but they are few and far between and none of them have any recomission value. Collision could but it would be pushing it a bit and it would basically be the same thing. I called "Collsion" Crash in a post a couple of days ago. Nobody corrected me. Must have been a boring post.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:25.



IMO Emmerdale has been the success story of the year for ITV-when everything else has decreased on ITV1, Emmerdale has increased hugely both in ratings and quality for a show that was dying a couple of years ago and continues to provide a great lead in for Corrie and boosts the otherwise weak Tuesdays and often Wednesdays. I can count the number of times Emmerdale has fallen below 6m in normal circumstances on one hand. Something which couldn't be said this time last year. It's recovered from an extremely weak period.
) to Thursday.
Nobody corrected me. Must have been a boring post.
