Originally Posted by pulltheotherone:
“Someone on Twitter asked Sugar if he read the Apprentice thread on DS, as they knew he used to post on DS, does anyone know if that is true? Sugar never replied, so I take that as a no to reading the thread. I'm surprised to see Sugar on Twitter, and Facebook to be honest. It was that Frank PR that asked Sugar about the Rooney scandal, and Sugar foolishly responded, not once, but twice, so left himself open to silly questions.
I have gone off Sugar a bit since following him on Twitter, as he comes across as a right show off! Not only is he friends with that twonk Piers Morgan, but that scum bag Max Clifford, so maybe Sugar is not so squeaky clean as he would like everyone to believe?”
I checked again, and you're right. However it's a full two days later, and many many tweets, that the twonk (not the twonk Piers Morgan) asks Sugar
'Following the Rooney story, as a successful business man in the public eye, have you ever used a prostitute?'
Which shouldn't even have been dignified with a reply.
No idea if Sugar has ever posted on here. But I'd doubt it.
If twitter and facebook seem such a novelty to him, they wouldn't if he'd been on forums surely? I think he's been a wary of the ordinary public, slightly afraid even, as they are unpredictable. Some one has convinced him he's loved. Taylor Herring, who PR the show, do post, but under various names. They call it online PR, forum people would call that bit trolling. Anything to raise interest. Background dirt in papers then posted here are always suspect. They also supply DS non-forum press releases.
Sugar's relationship with The Twonk Piers Morgan (TTPM) goes back over a decade at least. TTPM's replacing Larry King, has prompted mention of the 'city slickers' insider share dealings. Two journos went to jail, but TTPM did not, even though he emptied his and his wife's bank accounts to buy £67,000 of Viglen shares. It's a complicated story as there was an attempt to cover up at the Mirror.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2005...lishing.mirror though further info has I think come out years later. Sugar has never been accused of involvement btw, and there's never been any suggestions that he did anything improper or mistaken. Others used info he had given (about Viglen's future plans) to their own unfair advantage.
Squeaky clean? No doubt he loves to hype himself (not alone in that eh?) and the hype/PR around the Apprentice is that he is the UK's greatest boss. Of course he isn't. Talented yes, looks/acts the part yes, willing to go along with TV producers to create a fiction, yes.
But for all his celeb desires, his McCain Factory on the shoulder etc, he's not like so many rich people involved in the arms trade (sorry
defence industry). Not polluted parts of the world and walked away. Unlike some, no one has died, cos they got in the companies way and could affect the share price.
Ok, the huge money gifts to Labour are suspect, I mean he loves to get a good deal. And the holding company is Jersey based (Branson's are far more complicated to the point of confusion). But as dirty as some? No. Break the law? No. No evidence whatsoever. No accusations either (and nor am I implying). I've worked for multi-nationals, and saw hypocracy, lying and no morals there. Compared to them, Sugar is straighter than many the markets love. And I'm no fan.