Originally Posted by nwhitfield:
“And, indeed, it's also not entirely fair looking with hindsight at a statement that was made before the bank bailouts and all the other attendant troubles that hit the economy.
In May 2008, they may well have had more indications of interest than actually bore fruit in the end; but you can't castigate someone at a press conference for being positive, rather than saying "Well, we should have 200 channels by the end of the year, if all the people who said they're interested do sign on the dotted line, and nothing totally unforseen like, oh I don't know, the collapse of Lehman Brothers, say, causes problems with the economy."”
That is a good and relevant point there, nwhitfield. lt's only really been in these past few months that advertising revenues have started to recover for the media sector.
l daresay many media groups put their expansion plans on hold and it may be many months yet before they have the confidence (and cash) to revive and implement them. l don't think the Freesat consortium can shoulder the blame for that.
Over the next six months to a year, what we might start to see is a stream of the advertising-funded satellite channels starting to join Freesat and add to the existing channel line-up.