|
||||||||
Does Lane come from a rich family? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 50
|
Does Lane come from a rich family?
In the information provided in this poll, it states that Lane is wealthy. If so, should someone as wealthy as Lane be allowed to win?
Go see and vote on this poll: http://whosright.com/poll/big-brothe...allowed-to-win Does anyone know if this is true? If so, then he shouldn't be allowed to even be on the show!!! |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 25,385
|
Apparently so. I dont see why he shouldnt be allowed to play though. Its not supposed to be a game to help peoples lives out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Stockport, UK
Posts: 12,992
|
Just remember Russell from Survivor aka 'this greatest Survivor ever' *sick* is extremely rich.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 50
|
Quote:
Apparently so. I dont see why he shouldnt be allowed to play though. Its not supposed to be a game to help peoples lives out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 39,227
|
BB is a gameshow, not a charity so anyone can compete and win
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Posts: 2,678
|
Quote:
Just remember Russell from Survivor aka 'this greatest Survivor ever' *sick* is extremely rich.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Posts: 2,678
|
Quote:
True, but if you're already rich, let someone else have a chance to get some cash. He doesn't need it if that is true, while some of the other contestants do. Its just the principle
There is no principle here. It's not charity, it's a competition. If they were basing it on need, they could find needier people than any of them. But that's not the point. It's a competition, and nobody deserves to win it except the person who plays best. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 16,854
|
Based on this logic we would get dreadful winners like Kathy every season. I hate it with a passion when people vote for the winner based on who needs it most, it totally goes against the point of the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 25,385
|
Quote:
True, but if you're already rich, let someone else have a chance to get some cash. He doesn't need it if that is true, while some of the other contestants do. Its just the principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 25,385
|
Quote:
There are poorer countries where people might think you were rich beyond any legitimate need, so why don't you send your paycheck to those who are much poorer than yourself?
There is no principle here. It's not charity, it's a competition. If they were basing it on need, they could find needier people than any of them. But that's not the point. It's a competition, and nobody deserves to win it except the person who plays best. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:49.


