Originally Posted by outside:
“Well, I like The Defenders but you can't go wrong with those characters, can you? Well, I suppose you can... but that's a different forum!
To make a comparison with a certain show-runner, if I may... you're constantly told how great a writer is but you, personally, don't understand what all the fuss is about. I had that with Cornell and Kate Orman during the NAs. I didn't rate them as being particularly exceptional but, it seemed to me, everyone else did. (Also, Orman had a pop at me in DWM but that's beside the point). I just accepted, unhappily, that the majority liked them and I didn't.
Cornell's writing style, prose-wise, is fine but a lot of the content stuck in my craw. For example - let's rehabilitate the Vardans! I know you, like myself, appreciate "The Invasion of Time" but would you bring them back as a believable adversary? I wouldn't. They're nothing. Sure, anything and anyone can be re-invented but, when it comes down to it, they're bland and cliched.”
Well, yes-but then, that was rather the point of bringing them back, they
were bland and cliched! That's why you get that wonderful exchange between the Vardans and Benny, something along the lines of 'do not people tremble at our name?' 'well, no. Usually, they say things like 'oh, thank heavens, it's only the Vardans'.
Quote:
“The Nimon? Again, monsters who've become a punchline. If you must bring them back, at least do something with them. Yeah, Davies dragged the Macra back from their grave but he didn't pretend they were any more exceptional than they had been originally. I don't like Cornell's BF scripts, either, but, to be honest, I don't like many of their script writers' work!”
We find ourselves firmly on opposite sides of the fence, here...