|
||||||||
Reclassifying Films |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#201 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,411
|
Quote:
You've raised a great point there. I think another reason why it was rated PG instead of 15 in the 1980's is because of the target audience - there's a v/low risk of a child being exposed to it by the fault of their own actions as it probably doesn't appeal to them.
Yeah, I did say in my first post that the context of the film was why they probably chose PG over 15 originally (it's sedate period drama setting). But that was something they had to weigh up before the 12 was introduced - as a result, we're now regularly seeing tame 15's downgraded and strong PG's upgraded when rereleased. It stands to reason it would get a 12 with that scene in it. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#202 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 238
|
Son of Saul is out on DVD today and with that in mind, I've noticed that hardly any Holocaust films are rated 18, despite the graphic nature of the subject matter. Even Uwe Boll's 'Auschwitz', which was slated upon release for being too gruesome and features a scene of tooth extraction, is rated 15.
The only 18-rated Holocaust film I've come across is a 1945 documentary called 'German Concentration Camps Factual Survey', which was given that rating in 2015 for 'graphic footage of atrocities'. It was abandoned for seventy years before being completed in 2014. Despite the adults-only rating it carries in the UK, five of the six reels were shown as an episode of the PBS series 'Frontline' in 1985 (although I think it was shown in a late-night slot). I get that the BBFC are more lenient with historical films and I can understand why, but in some cases it just ends up being inconsistent and confusing for parents.* The BBFC openly admitted that the subject matter is the only reason why Saving Private Ryan didn't get an 18 rating and Ferman said, "We felt that it told the truth about war and we didn't want war glamorised for teenagers". |
|
|
|
|
|
#203 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,106
|
Quote:
Son of Saul is out on DVD today and with that in mind, I've noticed that hardly any Holocaust films are rated 18, despite the graphic nature of the subject matter. Even Uwe Boll's 'Auschwitz', which was slated upon release for being too gruesome and features a scene of tooth extraction, is rated 15.
The only 18-rated Holocaust film I've come across is a 1945 documentary called 'German Concentration Camps Factual Survey', which was given that rating in 2015 for 'graphic footage of atrocities'. It was abandoned for seventy years before being completed in 2014. Despite the adults-only rating it carries in the UK, five of the six reels were shown as an episode of the PBS series 'Frontline' in 1985 (although I think it was shown in a late-night slot). I get that the BBFC are more lenient with historical films and I can understand why, but in some cases it just ends up being inconsistent and confusing for parents.* The BBFC openly admitted that the subject matter is the only reason why Saving Private Ryan didn't get an 18 rating and Ferman said, "We felt that it told the truth about war and we didn't want war glamorised for teenagers". |
|
|
|
|
|
#204 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Posts: 16,704
|
Quote:
I think intellectual snobbery has been a factor in the past. Foreign language films seem to have got away with explicit violence and sex scenes an English language film probably wouldn't have done.
(Always amused me they passed that one when the- in my 'umble opinion- far tamer Last House On The Left remained censored for years) |
|
|
|
|
#205 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 238
|
Quote:
I think intellectual snobbery has been a factor in the past. Foreign language films seem to have got away with explicit violence and sex scenes an English language film probably wouldn't have done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#206 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,278
|
Quote:
Were you talking about foreign films in general or specifically about Son of Saul? IMO Son of Saul is fine at a 15 certificate.
Oh, and intellectual snobbery is very much part and parcel of the BBFC's remit, though they will swear blind that it isn't. However, the evidence gives lie to their ridiculous assertions. Ask them why the full-on Art-house porn of Gaspar Noe's LOVE is OK at 18, but not the comparatively small amount of hardcore images in Radley Metzger's SCORE (all of which were cut from Arrow's recent video version), and watch 'em squirm... |
|
|
|
|
|
#207 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 238
|
Quote:
There's almost no on-screen violence in SON OF SAUL, only a small amount of natural nudity in the context of people entering the gas chambers and their corpses being removed, and no swearing that I can recall. It's more about the tone of the piece, though I think it's really a very soft 15.
Spoiler
I've seen the film myself and I have to agree because
Spoiler
An interesting point to note is that the Irish content advisory mentions 'strong violence and harrowing holocaust scenes' - the IFCO gave the film a 15A rating. When a film gets a 15A rating in Ireland it usually indicates it's at the softer end of a 15 in the UK. They also noted that the language was at the 'moderate' level, which is odd as I don't remember any. The BBFC's extended insight doesn't mention any issues with language either. |
|
|
|
|
|
#208 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,106
|
Quote:
Were you talking about foreign films in general or specifically about Son of Saul? IMO Son of Saul is fine at a 15 certificate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#209 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Posts: 16,704
|
Quote:
No, I haven't seen Son of Saul yet. Irreversible is the kind of example I had in mind.
You're right in that the Gaspar Noe/Michael Haneke/Lars Von Trier type euro arthouse directors aren't likely to get censored these days |
|
|
|
|
#210 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 238
|
Bedknobs and Broomsticks has been upgraded from U to PG over 'mild bad language'.
The language they had a problem with was the use of 'bloody' and 'ruddy', said once each. Is that really all it takes nowadays? |
|
|
|
|
|
#211 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 44
|
Quote:
Bedknobs and Broomsticks has been upgraded from U to PG over 'mild bad language'.
The language they had a problem with was the use of 'bloody' and 'ruddy', said once each. Is that really all it takes nowadays? |
|
|
|
|
|
#212 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 596
|
And "piss off" is in Watership Down which remains a U.
I'd have said "piss off" is stronger than "bloody" or "ruddy". Strange decision. |
|
|
|
|
|
#213 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,411
|
If I recall from Bedknobs, the child says it in an aggressive manner - although it's been so many years since I've seen it I may be misremembering it. It did stand out from the general tone of the film.
Perhaps, because it's a clear bit of deliberate naughty swearing from a small child - and not some offhand, casual muttering by a grown up, they reckon its a bit inappropriate for a U. Behaviour that can be copied, and so on. Which is fair enough. |
|
|
|
|
|
#214 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Posts: 16,704
|
Quote:
And "piss off" is in Watership Down which remains a U.
I'd have said "piss off" is stronger than "bloody" or "ruddy". Strange decision. |
|
|
|
|
#215 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 238
|
What's worth mentioning is that the Blu-ray of Bedknobs and Broomsticks is also rated PG, but only because of the special features. The recent submission was for a cinema re-release.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#216 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 238
|
Quote:
They've publicly said Watership Down should be a PG, but they have no way of changing it unless the distributor wants to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#217 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Posts: 16,704
|
I would suspect there's lots of video that's U/PG from the 90's that be higher now. For example there's an episode of Star Trek DS9- Image in the Sand- that's PG which has a shot of a character being stabbed with blood, then a shot of the bloody knife, there's no way it'd be PG under the current guidelines.
|
|
|
|
|
#218 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Posts: 16,704
|
One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest was lowered from 18 to 15 today.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:44.



