Originally Posted by TerryM22:
“You may consider this to be tedious but there is no doubt it will help her to progress further on the show, as the newspapers have already pointed out.”
And since when were 'the newspapers' in any way a credible source of information where Strictly is concerned? If they were right, then Pamela Anderson would be competing this year ...
With the greatest respect, qwertyqueen is quite right: this argument really
is tedious. It's done to death every year and the only people who get anything out of it are the tabloid journalists who want to attack Strictly as part of a wider anti-BBC campaign.
You seem to be under the impression that Strictly is a dance competition where the most technically adept flourish and the less skilled don't.

How far from the truth is that?!
The judges may look for technical ability but what the public look for are contestants with personalities they can engage with - who can bring something of themselves onto the dancefloor. We have seen countless times that celebs who just aren't liked - for whatever reason, and however good or bad they may be technically - struggle to survive. It's going to be a helluva lot tougher this year, too, now that the dance-off has (quite rightly

) been junked.
Of course Kara has to impress the judges - as do all the contestants - but if the public don't take to her, then she's toast.
We've seen only a little of Kara so far but, to me, she came across as quite likeable. But it's very early days ...