Originally Posted by
*Liya*:
“He got his #1 because radio supported his song, the video was everywhere and he had good promo on his side. Above all that it's catchy and overall..quite good i would say. The song is still in the top 5...he's co-written most of his material. It's a bit unfair to say he's only in it for the fame. Surely, no one believed he'd go fully nude?... 
Not sure what credibility he had to lose in the first place.... he's a popstar on his first single...it takes years for critics to even take you seriously these days.”
When he canceled a gig for fans to appear on TV that is in it for the fame (not the first time by the way). Fans who bought the tickets for the gig couldn't even get their money back. He also didn't do anything for them to make it up. Compare this to Westlife, who was in the same situation and did their fan event and the TV event.
Also, Isn't it kind of too much of a coincidence that this whole brother hating him happened in the same week that his single is being release? I mean this whole brother story happen last year in Nov, so why is it now that it is published.
Also, sorry but co-writing does not mean anything. Even when an artist changed a couple of words or title, it's supposedly co-writing. And you know that is what happened. Don't get me wrong, he probably helped out, but the idea, production, and main parts of the written song were not done by him. He might have added things here and there, but let's not play it off as bigger than what it really is.
And this whole "I will get naked if I get #1" is desperate and pathetic tbh. What real artist, starting or current does that??? He really didn't put himself in a good light there to be taken seriously right. I mean if Cheryl Cole did that, I will buy 100 copies of what every she is selling and I am not buying it for the music.