Originally Posted by Xio:
“The Samba is rarely danced well. The judges have been giving out ridiculously high scores for many of the dances over the last few years, but I'd say the average score for that dance is quite low.
It's a pity that so few people take to the latin dances. Are latin dances harder or is it just that British people get embarrassed easily? The American celebs seem to be much better at latin.”
In some ways the Latin dances are harder. In ballroom you learn to take up hold, and with the exception of the tango, that hold is the same for waltz, quickstep, foxtrot and Viennese.
In Latin, the arms are mostly free, and have to be used expressively, and that means different movements in every one of the 5 dances.
The legwork in ballroom is also very similar in each dance - basically forward steps, backward steps and a few skips here and there....yes, I know I'm over simplifying. (Correct footwork is a bonus, but seldom mentioned when omitted!!!) But the main thing for the celeb is that he/she is led at all times by their pro partners.
Latin consists of far more steps, kicks, flicks, runs etc., during which probably less than 50 percent of the dance is the celeb connected to his/her partner. This means the rest of time they have to concentrate for themselves. Timing, of course, is something else that is harder when they are not being led by their partners, They also need to be far more expressive as each of the Latin dances has a totally different characteristic.