|
||||||||
Aspect ratio |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 249
|
Aspect ratio
Do they sell flatscreen tv with an aspect ratio of 16:9 instead of 16:10 ?
Does my question make sense?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Heart of England.
Posts: 8,633
|
The vast majority of screens are 16:9.
Some (but not all) smaller sets are 16:10. Is that what you meant? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 249
|
I have a 3yr 32 inch and it look more square than rectangular and I seen a 40 inch that looks the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,789
|
Quote:
I have a 3yr 32 inch and it look more square than rectangular and I seen a 40 inch that looks the same.
I'm not sure about 32's?, I may even have one at work, or perhaps it's only a 26? - I'll look tomorrow. But basically 16:10 was a computer monitor shape, and some of the crap manufacturers used those cheap panels to make cheap TV's. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: S.West England.
Posts: 18,037
|
16:10 format is some thing I have only seen on sub 20inch LCD tv's. No current 23 up LCD uses it from what I can see.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,789
|
I've just checked the set at work, it's a cheap Bush (which came in to be thrown away), and it's a 27 inch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,849
|
16:10 was mainly used by computer moniters, some of the cheapo brands allso used the format, i suspect they used converted moniters, have only seen 16:10 on smaller TVs sub 22".
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:18.


