Originally Posted by rzt:
“Oh come off it. I'm not trying to rain on Channel 5's parade, it was just more of a general point regarding +1 channels, which I wanted to talk about anyway but conveniently came up when Pizza mentioned he didn't think they should be included.”
“Oh come off it. I'm not trying to rain on Channel 5's parade, it was just more of a general point regarding +1 channels, which I wanted to talk about anyway but conveniently came up when Pizza mentioned he didn't think they should be included.”
Fair enough, I take back my original comment which was uncalled for in this instance.
Originally Posted by rzt:
“But I do stand by what I said previously that you can't treat C4 as a standalone channel when they've got a +1 channel which is pulling in a decent share and is to some extent affecting their main channel share.”
“But I do stand by what I said previously that you can't treat C4 as a standalone channel when they've got a +1 channel which is pulling in a decent share and is to some extent affecting their main channel share.”
But you are making it sound as if the only reason why Ch5 is winning nights over Ch4 is because Ch4 has a +1 which is splitting the audience. Simply not true. It may partially split it, but it's bringing in additional viewers first and foremost. Even if we go along with your method though, Ch5 still won Tuesday primetime quite convincingly, +1 included or not, so you can't really deny that Ch5 is making significant progress and winning more nights over Ch4 than is normal.
I guess it just boils down to preference but for me +1 should be kept separate since they are not a direct simulcast like HD. Nothing else to add to that really except I'm off to watch The Mentalist.




