|
||||||||
How many companions waited for the Doctor, and waited and waited? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 15,372
|
I do enjoy reading people's different views.
Thank you. |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 15,071
|
Quote:
We may have seen the Doctor's granddaughter, but nowhere (aside from that Queen Elizabeth thing I prefer to try to forget) has it ever been stated that he was married, or not on Gallifrey, at least. That has been assumed by a few people in fandom, but never confirmed either in the TV series or anywhere else. And it doesn't really fit with the sterile society of the Time Lords as it has been depicted from The War Games onward.
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 726
|
Quote:
Why assume they would have the same kind of family relationships we have on Earth? The novel Lungbarrow pretty much confirms that they don't, usually.
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shotley, Suffolk
Posts: 10,824
|
Quote:
... so how did he get a grandaughter then. Did he think about her and she materialised?
PS: The Queen Bess thing was mainly accentuated by Moff, the silly sausage*
Spoiler
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,360
|
Quote:
To my knowledge, the Doctor only promised to one person that he would come back - and that was Susan. The swine never did! OK, she saw him in 'The Five Doctors', but that was by accident. He had no intention of going back to her!
(He probably thought in TFD, "Ohh goodness me, the wretched girl is going to sprain her ankle again!!") ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The TARDIS
Posts: 11,931
|
Quote:
You don't need to be married to have kids, or even need to conceive them naturally. The Time Lords would need to perpetuate their species, of course-but they're an advanced alien society, assuming they'd have the same family structures, the same biological imperatives, the same thought processes as us just displays a lack of imagination, I think.
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 8,309
|
Quote:
"I'm rubbish at weddings, especially my own" - the Doctor in Blink. But you're right, he may not have married on Gallifrey.
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 903
|
He can't be though, can he? A wedding isn't an engagement. He would have said, I am rubbish at engagtements.
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 8,309
|
Yeah - just a lighthearted aside. I forgot to put a smiley in. Here's one now:
. But (to keep the argumentative mood flowing!) the only purpose of an engagement period is to lead in to the wedding event, so bottling during the former does by default make you a bit rubbish at the latter. ![]() I do really think that he meant a proper wedding, though (I just thought I'd be a clever dick in front of Granny). And in my head he once did have a wife, a daughter and a granddaughter (who we saw), but I don't have a great deal of direct evidence for that loosely held belief. I am also happy for people who have a continuity from the audio plays and novels to enjoy all that stuff as well - I'm not saying they're wrong, but I mostly get continuity from the TV episodes. I don't really much mind if he never explains his true back story. I suppose time lord society must be strange so I can understand why the lungbarrow type speculations are interesting. Maybe they do get married, but when one of them regenerates the other gets to invoke an opt out clause. It's not just physical looks - imagine waking up one morning to find a sixth Doctor type grumping about making an arse of himself. Or maybe most regenerations were non traumatic non emergency ones and there's a degree of choice and control (flicking through a catalogue like Romana - but let's not remember that.). |
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 8,309
|
Quote:
Disclaimer: I think men are just as complex, but in a different way.
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 15,071
|
Quote:
I do really think that he meant a proper wedding, though (I just thought I'd be a clever dick in front of Granny). And in my head he once did have a wife, a daughter and a granddaughter (who we saw), but I don't have a great deal of direct evidence for that loosely held belief. I am also happy for people who have a continuity from the audio plays and novels to enjoy all that stuff as well - I'm not saying they're wrong, but I mostly get continuity from the TV episodes. I don't really much mind if he never explains his true back story.
I suppose time lord society must be strange so I can understand why the lungbarrow type speculations are interesting. Maybe they do get married, but when one of them regenerates the other gets to invoke an opt out clause. It's not just physical looks - imagine waking up one morning to find a sixth Doctor type grumping about making an arse of himself. Or maybe most regenerations were non traumatic non emergency ones and there's a degree of choice and control (flicking through a catalogue like Romana - but let's not remember that.). ![]() I always thought it was odd Romana wasting so many regenerations if she only had 13. But perhaps they don't count unless you keep them. As for the Doctor's family life, should we add a mother? After the woman in white in The End of Time? And I always think you're clever, nebo
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,155
|
Quote:
And in my head he once did have a wife, a daughter and a granddaughter (who we saw),
![]() Quote:
I suppose time lord society must be strange so I can understand why the lungbarrow type speculations are interesting. Maybe they do get married, but when one of them regenerates the other gets to invoke an opt out clause. It's not just physical looks - imagine waking up one morning to find a sixth Doctor type grumping about making an arse of himself. Or maybe most regenerations were non traumatic non emergency ones and there's a degree of choice and control (flicking through a catalogue like Romana - but let's not remember that.).
"He's not the man I married your honour"... |
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 8,309
|
I think mother is not unreasonable but notice that the thread has drifted so won't discuss further. But I'm starting to think about what ting said about the sterile society that we've seen on screen so far (not really changed my mind yet though. Maybe if I actually bought some DVDs and watched some Gallifrey ones again for the first time in years...)
Psychiatrists have long debated my "head story canonicity". They tell me to mostly ignore the disembodied voices, unless it definitely is the radio. I agree with Face of Jack - poor Susan. I wonder if she suspected that one of the beliefs he was going forward with was a non-interference policy for ditched relatives. |
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 929
|
Quote:
which is not canon...!
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 9,542
|
Quote:
Divorce proceedings must be commonplace on Gallifrey.
"He's not the man I married your honour"... |
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shotley, Suffolk
Posts: 10,824
|
Quote:
I'd never thought of that before ... but I spose you're right. Leela must have got a shock when Andred regenerated. But, as Andred spent a relatively peaceful life at home in the Capitol, he wouldn't have been using upr egenerations quickly like the Doctor or the Master, both of whom were "out on the road", so Andred's current body would probably have lasted at least as long as Leela's lifespan.
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 726
|
Quote:
According to which legitimate authority?
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shotley, Suffolk
Posts: 10,824
|
There is nothing 'obvious' about it. And though I'm getting tired of repeating this: they aren't 'audiobooks'. An audiobook is a book being read aloud, an audioplay is something entirely different, it's a full cast drama recorded in studio.
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 929
|
Quote:
As much a legitimate authority as the one that says they ARE canon. And if there are overwhelming, massive continuity problems between the audiobooks and the TV series (I wouldn't know as haven't listened to them, but many of our learned friends on here have stated this is true), then obviously the TV show takes complete precedent and the audiobooks can be dismissed as jolly and entertaining but uiltimately non-canon fodder, like the comic strips, Dimensions in Time, etc etc. QED.
You are entitled to your opinion that they are not canon, but thats all it is, an opinion. |
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,570
|
Quote:
There is nothing 'obvious' about it. And though I'm getting tired of repeating this: they aren't 'audiobooks'. An audiobook is a book being read aloud, an audioplay is something entirely different, it's a full cast drama recorded in studio.
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 929
|
Quote:
Philip Olivier - who plays the Seventh Doctor's audio companion Hex - refers to them as "audiobooks" in the latest Big Finish magazine. I think he knows what he's talking about.
![]() an audiobook is a story that is read as a story The ones Phillip Oliver are in are full blown audio plays |
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,570
|
Quote:
Well obviously not!
an audiobook is a story that is read as a story The ones Phillip Oliver are in are full blown audio plays If the cast are willing to use the "wrong" term then the whole matter should just be dropped. |
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 929
|
Quote:
Yes, but constantly criticising people for using an incorrect description is just as bad as constantly complaining about spelling.
If the cast are willing to use the "wrong" term then the whole matter should just be dropped. |
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shotley, Suffolk
Posts: 10,824
|
Quote:
Fair point about the constantly correcting people, but I was just pointing out that it didn't automatically make Philip Oliver right because hes on the cds.
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 726
|
Quote:
You haven't answered my question though have you really! As myself and Ting have repeated MANY times, until someone like the BBC comes along and says things such as this are NOT canon they are open to other peoples personal opinions.
You are entitled to your opinion that they are not canon, but thats all it is, an opinion. So, take the audiobooks as canon and try getting your head round the fact that they jar with the TV series, get all wound up because the TV show doesn't follow what you believe to be fact as shown in the audiobooks, etc. Knock yourself out. I, and the majority of the TV viewing public, will take the TV show, and only the TV show, as canon, and be very happy enjoying it. |
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:29.




. But (to keep the argumentative mood flowing!) the only purpose of an engagement period is to lead in to the wedding event, so bottling during the former does by default make you a bit rubbish at the latter. 
