Originally Posted by frequencychange:
“Chrissy1978uk - the solution to your bitter hatred towards Carlos is simple. Change the station, stop following him on Facebook/Twitter and stop moaning.
He's a lovely bloke who was hired for a very simple reason, he's good at what he does. Talking about his joy of being a dad is something relatable and real - I can't possibly understand why you would think it's a bad thing for him to talk about it?!
People who take the time and effort to follow/like a radio presenter are actively choosing to find out more about them and get to know a bit more about the personality than what you hear on-air. If they don't care, they won't do it. They are the people who will see the pics of Carlos and his wife's pregnancy.
If you don't want to, just unfollow, unlike and change the station when he's on.
As for "Carlos = who". Stop being so daft. There was once a time where everybody went "Chris Moyles = who?" "Steve Wright = who?" as they made a transition to national radio, Carlos is doing the same. My reaction to Nick Peircey was initially "who?". I had to think about it to remember who he was (and my conclusion is that Carlos is the better choice).”
I decided to give the national Smooth a listen late this afternoon. As always Carlos sounds the consummate professional that he has always been. He is good at that style, even if it does sound somewhat dated, you can't knock him. Very personable. Sadly the music was the same old thing as always. The presenters must get bored by the banality of it all surely?. But I guess they feel lucky to have a job and it pays I guess. If I was Carlos and I had the chance to potentially widen my audience, I would do the same. And if he gets a better offer at some point from another station I'm sure he would go to that. He's only looking after his own interests, and increasing his profile. But to be so disconnected from your job must be awful, although many people are in other jobs so maybe that's the key. Just turn up, be professional and play the narrowest of music and then go home. Because of the bland playlist I will not bother again, and as I have said before, Radio 2 have nothing to worry about in that respect. Smooth as with Heart will continue doing what it does, but as I have said elsewhere this doesn't mean it is good. But people will listen because it is on in the background, and most people just have it on as background. It is a shame because it could be really good, but they aren't interested in being good are they?. As long as it pulls an audience and makes money and keeps shareholders happy, that is all that matters. There's no point in analysing it forever, if you don't like it do as i do and don't listen. Finally, about a year ago I was contacted by a market research company doing something for Smooth and BT. I said I didn't listen, and that in the end is the key. Market forces will either ensure that Smooth makes a profit, or their overall audience will fall in proportion if people don't like it. But you have to remember that overall people don't care as long as they have something to listen to on the way to and from work, etc. And of course Smooth and the rest of the commercial sector do not have the same remit as the BBC. I am just glad that we have them, as Smooth is really the equivalent of a tabloid newspaper. It has a limited remit, which is to make money from the format it can get away with making money from.