• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
sausage comment
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
Karl Marks
01-10-2010
Originally Posted by blowup:
“that's why i was surprised, because i know nothing about sausage week.
”

What's there to know about sausage?
galentine
01-10-2010
Even bearing the Sausage Week context in mind, it was still a sh*t joke from an old dinosaur.
Paace
01-10-2010
Originally Posted by blowup:
“i'm not offended just seems like an odd joke to make.”

Bruce can only do rehearsed 'jokes' and that was one he prepared beforehand.
Servalan
01-10-2010
Originally Posted by galentine:
“Even bearing the Sausage Week context in mind, it was still a sh*t joke from an old dinosaur.”

I agree and I also strongly suspect that PD knew exactly what meaning could be read into the comment.

He will then protest his innocence whilst smirking.

All of which says more about him than it does about anything else.
Zeus
01-10-2010
Originally Posted by Paace:
“Bruce can only do rehearsed 'jokes' and that was one he prepared beforehand.”

Walls. Bruce's ad lib skills are legendary! Although I agree he isn't as sharp as he used to be.
Giddy
01-10-2010
Originally Posted by Paace:
“Bruce can only do rehearsed 'jokes' and that was one he prepared beforehand.”

Oh dear - the 'joke' was from Paul Daniels, not Brucie!
ianswaiting
01-10-2010
Originally Posted by *stargazer*:
“Don't over-react. It was a joke about a sausage campaign they have both been involved in.”

Craig looked like he was trying hard to keep a straight face so he obviously wasn't offended.
Paace
01-10-2010
Originally Posted by Giddy:
“Oh dear - the 'joke' was from Paul Daniels, not Brucie!”

Same applies to Daniels.
mklass
01-10-2010
Originally Posted by horwichallstars:
“Fuss about nothing - it's the kind of the CRH himself would say.”

I didn't think Craig looked too happy about any of the 'jibes' that were thrown at him tonight!, and Brucie had plenty he was throwing.... :yawn:.. i don't think there was any need for any of them tonight!......
Paace
01-10-2010
Originally Posted by mklass:
“I didn't think Craig looked too happy about any of the 'jibes' that were thrown at him tonight!, and Brucie had plenty he was throwing.... :yawn:.. i don't think there was any need for any of them tonight!......”

I agree, Bruce is going too far in his mocking of Criag paticularly when he kept on repeating disaster. I don't find it funny but nasty. Bruce himself can't take a joke. Look how shirty he got when Tess commented about his blood pressure in a joking way.
mklass
01-10-2010
Originally Posted by Paace:
“I agree, Bruce is going too far in his mocking of Criag paticularly when he kept on repeating disaster. I don't find it funny but nasty. Bruce himself can't take a joke. Look how shirty he got when Tess commented about his blood pressure in a joking way.”

Lol.... yeah!....and he certainly has never got over Jonathon Ross's 'doddery' insinuation.......
BuddyBontheNet
01-10-2010
Originally Posted by Servalan:
“I agree and I also strongly suspect that PD knew exactly what meaning could be read into the comment.

He will then protest his innocence whilst smirking.

All of which says more about him than it does about anything else.”

I said the same thing on another thread and I'm glad to see we are still in tune!

I try to give people the benefit of the doubt, but my gut feeling and/or instinct tell me not to trust Paul at all - I don't think he's a very nice man.
DeccaQuinne
02-10-2010
Paul Daniels is a chippy little thing - he's always furious & thinks everyone is being nasty to him so he's not the best person to be cracking jokes - but it was a double entendre sex joke & it wasn't any different to any sex joke involving pussies or other euphemisms.

You could call it tacky or inappropriate - but not homophobic.
Potato Pete
02-10-2010
Craig scored Paul 2. Len looked astonished and said to Craig "you need a number 2".
Is this a symptom of too many sausages?
*stargazer*
02-10-2010
Originally Posted by Potato Pete:
“Craig scored Paul 2. Len looked astonished and said to Craig "you need a number 2".
Is this a symptom of too many sausages?”

He was looking very constipated!!!! Good old Len.
BelgoLift
02-10-2010
Craig mentions the 'King of Sizzle' title on his Twitter page today:
http://twitter.com/CraigRevHorwood

And that Paul had the title last year.
Servalan
02-10-2010
Originally Posted by BuddyBontheNet:
“I said the same thing on another thread and I'm glad to see we are still in tune!

I try to give people the benefit of the doubt, but my gut feeling and/or instinct tell me not to trust Paul at all - I don't think he's a very nice man.”

We must be psychic twins ...

The more think about it, the more I am convinced that PD did this deliberately in order to generate publicity for himself. He's worked out that the chances of him dancing his way to success are slim so he's doing this instead.

You can already see the Daily Heil jumping on this and turning into 'poor PD told off for being un-PC' (:yawn and using it to attack the BBC via Strictly yet again (:yawn::yawn::yawn.

It's a shabby gesture and my instincts are precisely the same as yours. I don't think he will have made himself many friends last night and the person I feel sorriest for is Ola, being stuck with someone who comes across as a snidy sourpuss.
mklass
02-10-2010
Originally Posted by BuddyBontheNet:
“I try to give people the benefit of the doubt, but my gut feeling and/or instinct tell me not to trust Paul at all - I don't think he's a very nice man.”

No i agree.... he did a celebrity wife swap a few years back and although i didn't watch it myself i seem to remember that whoever had to 'live' with him wasn't very impressed!.....
-Sid-
02-10-2010
I honestly don't believe it was meant as a slight on Craig's sexuality.

Craig has been tweeting about Sausage Week and Paul (who is also on Twitter) was just trying to make a joke out of it.
Espresso
02-10-2010
Originally Posted by Servalan:
“I agree and I also strongly suspect that PD knew exactly what meaning could be read into the comment.

He will then protest his innocence whilst smirking.

All of which says more about him than it does about anything else.”

I reckon that Craig Revel Horwood knew full well what sort of comic potential there was in him accepting the role of being the face of sausage week.
Especially when the previous incumbent was slated to appear in Strictly.

If both of them see the jokiness in it, why are other folk getting shirty about it?
Servalan
02-10-2010
Originally Posted by Espresso:
“I reckon that Craig Revel Horwood knew full well what sort of comic potential there was in him accepting the role of being the face of sausage week.
Especially when the previous incumbent was slated to appear in Strictly.

If both of them see the jokiness in it, why are other folk getting shirty about it?”

I didn't see Craig laughing last night, although I'm sure PD thinks he's hilarious.

And people are perfectly at liberty to comment on PD's motives for making a remark that could so obviously be interpreted in a number of ways. Aren't they?
Saturn
02-10-2010
I'm a gay male and I thought it was hilarious.
Vivacious Lady
02-10-2010
Since there is a rational explanation for the comment, I can't see any alternative than to just take the comment at face value and let it go. If Paul stays on strictly for a while then I'm sure we'll get a better opportunity to see aspects of his personality, but in the meantime I really think it is unfair to jump to conclusions.

Originally Posted by mklass:
“No i agree.... he did a celebrity wife swap a few years back and although i didn't watch it myself i seem to remember that whoever had to 'live' with him wasn't very impressed!.....”

To be fair, it was Vanessa Feltz who I would imagine would be just the teensty, weensty bit demanding......
Espresso
02-10-2010
Originally Posted by Servalan:
“I didn't see Craig laughing last night, although I'm sure PD thinks he's hilarious.

And people are perfectly at liberty to comment on PD's motives for making a remark that could so obviously be interpreted in a number of ways. Aren't they?”

This is a free country, so yes indeedy; people are perfectly at liberty to comment on whatever they like.
Just seems to me that we live in a world where an awful lot of people try really hard to be offended on other peoples' behalf. Empathy and compassion are fine and noble things, of course. But they can be misplaced. That's a judgement call, though. And your judgement is obviously different to mine.

But Craig Revel Horwood and Paul Daniels are die-hard showbiz types and they'll just both be delighted to have caused a "OHNOES HOMOPHOBIA" reaction in the media, because I'd bet my house it'll be in the papers tomorrow. Probably with a picture of them both settling down in lycra to eat sausages together.
Servalan
02-10-2010
Originally Posted by Espresso:
“This is a free country, so yes indeedy; people are perfectly at liberty to comment on whatever they like.
Just seems to me that we live in a world where an awful lot of people try really hard to be offended on other peoples' behalf. Empathy and compassion are fine and noble things, of course. But they can be misplaced. That's a judgement call, though. And your judgement is obviously different to mine.

But Craig Revel Horwood and Paul Daniels are die-hard showbiz types and they'll just both be delighted to have caused a "OHNOES HOMOPHOBIA" reaction in the media, because I'd bet my house it'll be in the papers tomorrow. Probably with a picture of them both settling down in lycra to eat sausages together. ”

I'm not offended by PD's comment - although I think it makes him look stupid and bitter - but it's his motives behind making that comment in the first place which I find highly dubious, for the reasons previously mentioned.

As for either Craig or PD settling down to eat sausages ...
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map