• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Have the ballroom rules changed?
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
fern3
03-10-2010
I was wondering if the rules for Ballroom had changed this year? Len has always said that the British rules for ballroom don't allow the couple to be out of hold, except for the beginning and end. Yet Natalie and Scott clearly came out of hold halfway through their routine. Have we moved to the American rules?
franglemand
03-10-2010
I don't know but I noticed the same thing. They only broke hold briefly but I expected Len at least to comment on it if they weren't allowed.
Mystical123
03-10-2010
They were always allowed to do a little out of hold I thought, but nothing significant except the American Smooth.

I thought the far more significant difference is that lifts and props are now allowed. Matt and Aliona and Kara and Artem both clearly did lifts in their cha chas, but the judges didn't say anything. Luckily they weren't flashy lifts and they actually worked well, but we no longer have only 2 dances where lifts are allowed.
franglemand
03-10-2010
Were they definitely lifts? I haven't re-watched either dance but when they happened I was trying to work out if they were definitely lifts or if they were in that slightly grey area, when the female dancer still has her toes on the floor so it's technically a "supported" something or other. I seem to remember a whole segment on ITT last year discussing the difference.
Mystical123
03-10-2010
Originally Posted by franglemand:
“Were they definitely lifts? I haven't re-watched either dance but when they happened I was trying to work out if they were definitely lifts or if they were in that slightly grey area, when the female dancer still has her toes on the floor so it's technically a "supported" something or other. I seem to remember a whole segment on ITT last year discussing the difference.”

Both Aliona and Kara's feet left the floor as far as I saw! I think there was a comment in the press a while back that said lifts would be allowed...
Doghouse Riley
03-10-2010
Err..

It's a "show" trying to compete with the X-factor on ratings, not a ballroom dance competition. The ones who best observe "the rules" don't win, it's the most popular dancers who win. It helps if they haven't two left feet.

Taking it seriously will only lead to frustration.
bumblefly
03-10-2010
There was an interview with Craig recently where he said they were allowing more 'contemporary' work this year including allowing lifts in all dances.

Interesting that they didn't mention that though in the live show :P


Now if only I could find the link...
rickster1995
03-10-2010
no that's just in the tango and quickstep they are not allowed to break hold.
dancingbearbear
03-10-2010
Originally Posted by franglemand:
“I don't know but I noticed the same thing. They only broke hold briefly but I expected Len at least to comment on it if they weren't allowed.”

I thought the same too. There's been a distinct change of tone overall so far, and it really does seem to be tipping more than a nod in the direction of DWTS, with 'themed' costumes and looser rules. Tina and Jared's dance was pure DWTS.

I wonder if this is something the production team have specifically requested this year? It would seem unlikely that several of the pros simultaneously decided that naff props were the way to go.
fern3
06-10-2010
Karen confired it last night. The rules have changed and they can break hold.
*stargazer*
06-10-2010
Originally Posted by fern3:
“Karen confired it last night. The rules have changed and they can break hold.”

Yes, she said that on ITT. WHy on earth isn't she a judge? She would add so much to the show!
DavidJames
06-10-2010
Originally Posted by franglemand:
“I don't know but I noticed the same thing. They only broke hold briefly but I expected Len at least to comment on it if they weren't allowed.”

Len's given up on commenting on the dancing, in favour of recycling inane Cock-er-ney soundbites. So I'm not surprised he didn't say anything.
mossy2103
06-10-2010
I don't mind the ballroom rule change, but I can live without any gimmicks & props thanks - that's too American/showbizzy and false.
fatskia
06-10-2010
We had a raunchy Waltz and two of the pros sliding between their partners legs for the finish.

I was looking forward to the Cha Cha Cha, but some were almost unrecognisable as such. Jared's and Kristina's for example.

These changes are going to mean that the character of the show will be lost. No longer will each dance have an identity - just substitute a Disco dance for any dance you like - break out of hold and do a few cartwheels.

We have had that problem for a while - how to do something new with each dance. It's increasingly more difficult as the years go on, but I would prefer that they had kept the character of the show.
Daisy19
06-10-2010
Originally Posted by fern3:
“Karen confired it last night. The rules have changed and they can break hold.”

I must've missed her saying that, i heard her say about the props though. I've also missed whatever was said about lifts being allowed aswell. I'm not sure i agree with all these changes i have to say.
Lucyleftfoot
06-10-2010
Originally Posted by dancingbearbear:
“I thought the same too. There's been a distinct change of tone overall so far, and it really does seem to be tipping more than a nod in the direction of DWTS, with 'themed' costumes and looser rules. Tina and Jared's dance was pure DWTS.

I wonder if this is something the production team have specifically requested this year? It would seem unlikely that several of the pros simultaneously decided that naff props were the way to go.”


As soon as I saw Jared with the sparkly book I said the exact same thing. I don't like the use of props and all that naffing about on the stairs.
librarygirl
06-10-2010
[quote=fatskia;44606183]We had a raunchy Waltz and two of the pros sliding between their partners legs for the finish.

I was looking forward to the Cha Cha Cha, but some were almost unrecognisable as such. Jared's and Kristina's for example.

These changes are going to mean that the character of the show will be lost. No longer will each dance have an identity - just substitute a Disco dance for any dance you like - break out of hold and do a few cartwheels.

We have had that problem for a while - how to do something new with each dance. It's increasingly more difficult as the years go on, but I would prefer that they had kept the character of the show.[/QUOTE

I agree, the character of the show has been lost if the first two episodes were anything to go by. Most of the latin dances didn't even resemble a Cha Cha Cha, Jared and Tina's dance was very poor, not because of Tina but because the choreography was rubbish. Len commented that Tina could have been given more to do, sounds like Len himself is going to have less to do, just comment on the props and the groping.
BuddyBontheNet
06-10-2010
TBH I don't mind the changes. The props are only for a few moments before they start dancing properly and as long as the time out of hold isn't too much, I think it adds to the dance. So long as the greater part of the performance is dancing the set dance, that's fine by me. Len will soon speak up if he thinks there is too much .

I think the changes will be liked by the general public too and it will only be a minority of the 9 million (a lot of whom will be on here), who don't.
mossy2103
06-10-2010
Originally Posted by BuddyBontheNet:
“TBH I don't mind the changes. The props are only for a few moments before they start dancing properly and as long as the time out of hold isn't too much, I think it adds to the dance.”

Can I at this stage mention the motorbike coming on stage (DWTS I think it was). Something like that is likely to leave more of an impression in the minds of the public than elements of the dance. Will it be out of the question that someone uses such on overblown prop to try to compensate for a bad dancer or lacklustre routine?

Props for the showdance - fine, but not for the competitive dances.
AntoniaA
06-10-2010
I think it was said in ITT that some of the rules had changed.
BuddyBontheNet
06-10-2010
Originally Posted by mossy2103:
“Can I at this stage mention the motorbike coming on stage (DWTS I think it was). Something like that is likely to leave more of an impression in the minds of the public than elements of the dance. Will it be out of the question that someone uses such on overblown prop to try to compensate for a bad dancer or lacklustre routine?

Props for the showdance - fine, but not for the competitive dances.”

I agree about the motobike on DWTS. All we can hope for on Strictly is that no one resorts to that kind of extreme. I'd like to see the better dancers use less props or none at all and then it will be clearer that excessive use of props is a sign of a weak dancer.

At least all the props were restricted to the stage area.
loulabelle44
06-10-2010
Originally Posted by mossy2103:
“Will it be out of the question that someone uses such on overblown prop to try to compensate for a bad dancer or lacklustre routine?”

I suspect not, although as you suggest, props are usually a way to cover poor dancing.

So I'm not sure why Matt & Aliona used props. If any couple don't need them, it's those two.
Erinfan
06-10-2010
Originally Posted by Mystical123:
“Both Aliona and Kara's feet left the floor as far as I saw! I think there was a comment in the press a while back that said lifts would be allowed...”

I've seen the move Kara and Artem did loads in proper latin comps, so I definitely don't think it's classed as a lift.

I don't like the rules changing and hoping that the content doesn't plummit in ballroom, but as long as we have great dances I won't moan...yet!
DavidJames
06-10-2010
Does anyone know what the new rules are then?

I guess it's too much to hope for a link....?
*Wysiwyg*
06-10-2010
It looks like they're making them up as they go along!
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map