Originally Posted by Pinkpaper:
“I think she is the best female dancer but I dont think she is being undermarked.
Her Quickstep annoyed me, while she was great during the bits she did dance I thought the routine was too full of solo dancing and cartwheels.”
Still, it was only one cartwheel, and the solo dancing was at least still dancing.
I would (and do) blame the show's producers for changing the rules so that a quickstep can be like that.
Quote:
“Her Charleston was again good but I think it lacked the 'quirkyness' and performance that the dance requires.”
The Charleston doesn't require the sort of "performance" that most of the others gave it, though. (Suitable example Charlestons
here, especially the Ginger Rogers ones.)
Kara and Artem's Charleston was fine as a Charleston, imo. Unfortunately, no one made it clear to Kara and Artem that SCD Charleston scoring was far more about OTT acting and "performance" than about dance.
Quote:
“I don't think we have seen her best yet and once she starts really 'performing' as well as dancing great I can see her getting top of the leaderboard.”
My worry at the moment is not the marking but the judge's comments. They will plant the idea in viewers' minds that there's something lacking in her dances, or will reinforce that idea if it's already present, while problems of similar significance in other couples are not being highlighted in the same way.