Originally Posted by rzt:
“The Grand Slam of Darts have been rating well on ITV4 so far this week. Averages for the 6pm-10.30pm sessions have been:
Sun 14th Nov- 326k (2009: 279k)
Mon 15th Nov- 428k (323k)
Tue 16th Nov- 420k (435k)
Wed 17th Nov- 438k (360k)
Thu 18th Nov- 522k (388k)
Fri 19th Nov- 447k (353k)
The coverage has been getting a ~2% share, more than double the usual channel share. Ratings up >20% year-on-year and matches peaking at about 700k. They should definitely pick up some more darts coverage if they can as there seems to be some demand for it. They'd be better off doing that instead of spending money on those new sports panel shows they've been commissioining recently which have only been getting ~100k or even less sometimes.”
ITV4's sport strategy really working out for them at the moment - and actually so much more efficient than running a sports channel as ITV4 can just run any old crap on nights when they haven't got live sport.
Originally Posted by rzt:
“Saturday 20th November Roundup
Channel 4 (inc. HD)
21:00- The Pillars of the Earth: 1.12m (4.5%)”
Well I never thought a drama about the building of a cathedral would be the sort of thing I'd watch, but this has been one of the best shows of the year IMO. Just a shame C4 put it in a slot which did it no favours - and also as is so often the case seemed to give up promoting it once the series began - I can't say I've seen any promos since those that aired pre-series.
C4 has some good mini-series in the works at the moment, but they've really got to get their overall drama strategy right to maximise the audience - and establish a point in the schedules where viewers know they'll find quality drama on C4.
Originally Posted by ZoeMcCallister:
“Just finishing watching XF and interesting that most of the popular acts aired in the first half, with the average acts in the middle and 2 controversial acts at the end. I reckon the most interesting bottom 2 tonight would be Katie V Wagner..”
Ridiculous Wagner hasn't been given the death slot yet and made to perform first to hasten his exit - yet Dannii's boys have been first out four times whilst Cheryl's girls have been last out five times. In previous series the running order was on the whole kept fair with categories alternating in the crucial first/last slots, and usually by this stage most of the acts remaining would have both survived performing first and also had the chance to close the show.
Strictly though obviously doing the same with Widdecomme though.
Originally Posted by mlt11:
“Yes, if a journalist writes an article with numbers in it then it's a good bet it will be completely wrong.
Usual story - copying out bits from a press release / other article without stopping for even a few seconds to understand the position and ensure that what is being written makes any kind of sense.”
See today's News of the World for example who claim two-thirds want William and Kate to be the next King and Queen - although the actual question asked is "Who do you think will be better on the throne?", rather than who should be on the throne next. Indeed they asked that question too and 47% said the crown should pass to Charles next, with 43% William - but they're not going to let the poll not going their way get in the way of an article full of bullshit now!