Originally Posted by grahamzxy:
“Around 30 million were watching tv last night - getting 50% of viewers is commendable but not sensational. I am sure the number crunchers here could find other shows with such an audience share.
If a viewer had to choose between antiques roadshow or XF a live show then the majority will choose the latter as the former is not exactly must see tv, it has been around for decades.
Great for DA didn't expect the ratings to climb so much throughout the run. Top rating for Countryfile as well.
Sunday tv here is still pulling in the viewers - but 50% of people still choose to do others things with their time.”
“Around 30 million were watching tv last night - getting 50% of viewers is commendable but not sensational. I am sure the number crunchers here could find other shows with such an audience share.
If a viewer had to choose between antiques roadshow or XF a live show then the majority will choose the latter as the former is not exactly must see tv, it has been around for decades.
Great for DA didn't expect the ratings to climb so much throughout the run. Top rating for Countryfile as well.
Sunday tv here is still pulling in the viewers - but 50% of people still choose to do others things with their time.”
How is a show that could come out as the most watched show of the year in a couple of weeks only be commendable??
You have high expectations. More people are watching TV because of XF, which is why there is always a high number of people watching TV when the XF Live Shows start. It happened last year too.
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“A talented potential top 4 might make it wide open, but does that automatically translate into higher viewing figures? I think it might run into choppy waters when it gets to the last couple of weeks myself as there seems to be a a lot of people that like two or more of those acts this year, and won't care who wins. That's a recipe for a disappointing finale (especially from a voting perspective) unless they can somehow keep someone with a bit of an 'edge' like Cher in. I don't doubt it's possible for them to manipulate it somehow to make this happen.”
“A talented potential top 4 might make it wide open, but does that automatically translate into higher viewing figures? I think it might run into choppy waters when it gets to the last couple of weeks myself as there seems to be a a lot of people that like two or more of those acts this year, and won't care who wins. That's a recipe for a disappointing finale (especially from a voting perspective) unless they can somehow keep someone with a bit of an 'edge' like Cher in. I don't doubt it's possible for them to manipulate it somehow to make this happen.”
Yeah, I guess you have a point there. As we've seen through various series of talent shows it's the controversial acts and stupid acts that get the public talking. As you say the final needs someone like Cher to spice things up. A Matt, Rebecca, One Direction final, which is what is being predicted would be fairly boring. The best final (ratings wise) would be Cher, Mary, One Direction imo...but it won't happen.
-----
Back to tonights ratings, anyone think Jack's final episodes in Corrie could just make 11m? They've been heavily promoted and there's a lot of drama with it too, plus the return of Vera. Jack is one of the few remaining Street legends, adding to that the bad weather, I hope the episodes do well.




