Originally Posted by RobbieSykes123:
“Yes, it's a bit surreal. But so was the 1970s series.
I had huge misgivings about this reimagining of a classic series. The first series got off to a shaky start to my mind. The laughter track was annoying. I was unsure about the PA and 2 mad assistants characters. But it was genuinely amusing, Clunes was on top form, and I got into it. I think this second series has moved forward nicely, capturing the surreal silliness of the original in the 21st century.
Apart from the odd creaky gag, and the annoying laughter track (which you get used to), there's hardly anything to fault it in my view.
And then there's the A-list cast - Martin Clunes, Fay Ripley, the lovely Lucy Liemann, Neil Stuke, Geoffrey Whitehead, Wendy Craig, Alexander Armstrong, Colin McFarlane (the Chairman). Even Sally Lindsay in a regular cameo (rather overplayed).
Written by two top comedy writing talents in David Nobbs (writer of the books and original series) and Simon Nye.
It should work, and I think it does. But it's not getting the ratings. I think too many people (as evidenced by comments on this thread) have written it off without either giving it chance, or watching it at all.
A travesty.”
I think one of the main problems with the show is that viewers who watched the original have had too high expectations of the show. With the Reggie Perrin name being used I suppose it helped bring fans of the original at the start but has also put a lot of those fans off when they relaised it was not as good as the original. If the show had a different title and a less obvious connection to the 1970s series then maybe more people would have given it a chance. Its hardly a brilliant sitcom but certainly enjoyable and deserves a higher audience.
And Lucy Liemann is certainly lovely too.