• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Soap Ratings Thread (Part 5)
<<
<
9 of 136
>>
>
Donna2010
19-11-2010
Last night

EastEnders - 5.97m
Emmerdale - 7.29m
Corrie - 8.77m

Hour long Emmerdale really dented EE last night. Bare in mind though the Emmerdale rating covers the whole one hour.
::Adam::
19-11-2010
Originally Posted by Donna2010:
“Last night

EastEnders - 5.97m
Emmerdale - 7.29m
Corrie - 8.77m

Hour long Emmerdale really dented EE last night. Bare in mind though the Emmerdale rating covers the whole one hour.”

EastEnders only got 5.97m?
Filiman
19-11-2010
Originally Posted by Donna2010:
“Last night

EastEnders - 5.97m
Emmerdale - 7.29m
Corrie - 8.77m

Hour long Emmerdale really dented EE last night. Bare in mind though the Emmerdale rating covers the whole one hour.”

It is a pity. Depends on what the repeat gets. If it's under 500-600 thousand, then that ain't good imo.

Still better than the dreadful ratings it was getting in 06.

The ONLY worry EE has is whether Corrie and EM are able to capture viewers during this period. If the Corrie anny storylines go anything like the EE ones, then they won't.

I suspect that like EE, Corrie will just be a lot of hype and people will tune in for the event and then tune out automatically after.
::Adam::
19-11-2010
How did BBC3 do?
dubgaz
19-11-2010
I dont think the BBC3 repeat of Eastenders shoudl be counted in the ratings. There are no repeats of Corrie or Emmerdale counted.
::Adam::
19-11-2010
Originally Posted by dubgaz:
“I dont think the BBC3 repeat of Eastenders shoudl be counted in the ratings. There are no repeats of Corrie or Emmerdale counted.”

They do get repeated tho - more so than EastEnders
Filiman
19-11-2010
Originally Posted by dubgaz:
“I dont think the BBC3 repeat of Eastenders shoudl be counted in the ratings. There are no repeats of Corrie or Emmerdale counted.”

I don't necessarily disagree.... repeats are very ify. But on one off occasions the repeat figures can be very telling.
WalfordFanatic
19-11-2010
I think going from 9.9million to 5.9million is saying something, 4 million people obviously didn't enjoy this week's episodes! lol
James J
19-11-2010
Time for ITV to cut Emmerdale back to 5 a week, or put it back on Sunday.

Hour longs/doubles are stupid.
::Adam::
19-11-2010
Originally Posted by WalfordFanatic:
“I think going from 9.9million to 5.9million is saying something, 4 million people obviously didn't enjoy this week's episodes! lol”

A chunk of them would be watching Emmerdale.
wallo mr slug
19-11-2010
Originally Posted by James J:
“Time for ITV to cut Emmerdale back to 5 a week, or put it back on Sunday.

Hour longs/doubles are stupid.”

Not from ITV's perspectives!
ZoeMcCallister
19-11-2010
Originally Posted by James J:
“Time for ITV to cut Emmerdale back to 5 a week, or put it back on Sunday.

Hour longs/doubles are stupid.”

The ratings say otherwise
I did It First!
19-11-2010
Originally Posted by WalfordFanatic:
“I think going from 9.9million to 5.9million is saying something, 4 million people obviously didn't enjoy this week's episodes! lol”

Are you for real? it was a clash with Emmerdale and given Emmerdale had a 30 minute head start what did you expect?

Seriously thats saying something...
I did It First!
19-11-2010
Originally Posted by ZoeMcCallister:
“The ratings say otherwise”

How? Emmerdale was down itself...
jude007
19-11-2010
Originally Posted by James J:
“Time for ITV to cut Emmerdale back to 5 a week, or put it back on Sunday.

Hour longs/doubles are stupid.”

No they are not.

I watch both Eastenders and Emmerdale and at the mo Emmerdale is far better than Eastenders in my opinion
Donna2010
19-11-2010
Originally Posted by ZoeMcCallister:
“The ratings say otherwise”

Originally Posted by wallo mr slug:
“Not from ITV's perspectives!”

Why so? On Tuesday when head to head from both starting at the same time, EE outrated Emmerdale completely. Emmerdale can only win over EE with a 30 minute head start however the hour long episodes which do clash with EastEnders are notably down.

If a show gets lower ratings than normal the ad revenue is less than it would be if they were higher. So when Emmerdale's ratings are dented by the clashes ITV gets less money.
I did It First!
19-11-2010
Originally Posted by Donna2010:
“Why so? On Tuesday when head to head from both starting at the same time, EE outrated Emmerdale completely. Emmerdale can only win over EE with a 30 minute head start however the hour long episodes which do clash with EastEnders are notably down.

If a show gets lower ratings than normal the ad revenue is less than it would be if they were higher. So when Emmerdale's ratings are dented by the clashes ITV gets less money.”

Exactly!
D.M.N.
19-11-2010
Ratings including HD:

19:00 - Emmerdale: 7.50m (33.3%)
19:30 - EastEnders: 5.99m (25.3%)
20:00 - Coronation Street: 9.10m (37.0%)
James J
19-11-2010
Literally lost for words at Emmerdale fans who don't agree one less episode would be better for the show.
I did It First!
19-11-2010
Originally Posted by James J:
“Literally lost for words at Emmerdale fans who don't agree one less episode would be better for the show.”

I think its more to do with the fact the hour clashes get one up on EE.

At least this thread always reveals people's true agendas and feelings towards certain soaps.
wallo mr slug
19-11-2010
Originally Posted by I did It First!:
“I think its more to do with the fact the hour clashes get one up on EE.

At least this thread always reveals people's true agendas and feelings towards certain soaps.”

lol at agendas.
Why on earth would anyone who doesn't work on a soap have an agenda? Ratings mean little more to me than minor interest.
And as a fan of EE as much as I am Emmerdale, once again, your juvenile accusations are way off
jojo2008
19-11-2010
EastEnders usually beats Emmerdale regardless of the head start. I think the reason EastEnders suffered badly last night is due to the quality of the show, which IMO, isn't great at present
charliestubbs
19-11-2010
Originally Posted by D.M.N.:
“Ratings including HD:

19:00 - Emmerdale: 7.50m (33.3%)
19:30 - EastEnders: 5.99m (25.3%)
20:00 - Coronation Street: 9.10m (37.0%)”

Now, THAT is a really strong rating for Coronation Street! The ratings have been up for a good while now! Add to that the fact it was on at a different time and it was a Thursday episode!

A low rating for EE last night, but it can't be helped. Foe those saying it suffered due to the poor quality of the show, I don't think this is entirely true....
Pizzatheaction
19-11-2010
Lots of EastEnders fans caught out by the hour-long Emmerdale last night. Hopefully more of them will cotton on for the next three Thursdays.
Sandsss
19-11-2010
Why have Emmerdale all of a sudden starting putting hour long episodes on a Thursday for? One last night and 1 next week and 1 the week after and there was meant to be 2 in the week of Corrie's 50th with 1 on the Tues and the Thurs but they only have it on the Thurs now.
<<
<
9 of 136
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map