Originally Posted by pickledgherkin:
“I think Lord Alan made the right decision to fire her but she is still a very capable woman and I have no doubt she has a great future ahead of her. On You're Fired she came across very well - they often do, having had a few weeks or even months to think about it, also the pressure is off. We must remember how the series is edited so that everyone's bad bits and (even worse) silly bits are shown, sometimes they are endearing but not always and not in Paloma's case.”
i think they were being very generous to her on YF which was interesting to watch in it self.
i think she proved that she is manipulative, dishonest and has no loyalty . its that underlying nastiness , the inability to own up to her own shortcomings - failings and the readiness to go for the jugular when she had no place to.
Quote:
“I must say Paloma looked like a very aristocratic beauty on You're Fired tonight.”
is looking nice now a criteria for alan to judge his victims?
Quote:
“ I hope she does well in all sorts of ways. When she was put on the spot about lying about Sandeesh (from previous task), I honestly thought she had genuinely forgotten her off the cuff remark she had made in the car about Sandeesh and would have said that, but it appears she hadn't forgotten, just couldn't bring herself to admit it in the boardroom.”
no she hadnt forgotten she thought it wouldnt be brought up. it wasnt off the cuff, she is pretty manipulative and forward thinking strategically to cover her backside. think of her as nasty nick from BB fame.
Quote:
“So she was honest at the last and she didn't need to be really, we would have believed her had she said she had forgotten that bit.”
no you are wrong we wouldnt have believed her and from her position she had no choice but to admit it.
her purpose in YF was to appear normal and conciliatory and eat humble pie.