OK, it's become clear from the tenor of the discussion on this forum over the past few weeks that the "it's all just a bit of entertainment" camp and the "shouldn't there be at least some dancing?" camp are never going to agree. So, in the spirit of Jonathan Swift's original, I present A Modest Proposal for satisfying both camps, even if we can't bring them together:
[LIST][*]Weeks 1 and 2 would proceed as at present, with each couple given two dances to 'set out their stalls.'
[*]At the end of week 2, the judges' scores for week 1 and 2 would be combined, with no public vote. The top seven highest scorers would go in to Pool A, and the lowest seven into Pool B.
[*]Pool A would then compete weeks 3, 5, 7, etc, with Pool B competing weeks 4, 6, 8, etc.
[*]In odd-numbered weeks, all the old rules about percentage time in hold, no lifts until later in the competition, etc, would be rigorously enforced.
[*]In the even-numbered weeks, the only rule would be that any routine that doesn't include at least one silly prop leads to instant disqualification. Any couple wishing to skip the time-wasting 90 seconds of "dance" and just get down to the essential business of being rude to the judges would be allowed, nay encouraged, to do so.
[*]Both sets of weeks would proceed as normal to their own finals, with two glitterballs awarded.
[*]The even-numbered weeks would be re-named "Strictly Come Faffingabout," to make it absolutely clear that it's not a dancing contest.
[*]People who actually want to watch a dance contest would be encouraged to watch
their old DVDs of the early series in even-numbered weeks. Or watch the panda-cam all evening. Or even, you know, go out socially or something.[/LIST]
I feel that this Modest Proposal, whilst not representing complete victory for either camp, at least gives both sides some of what they want. And what could be more egalitarian than that?
[LIST][*]Weeks 1 and 2 would proceed as at present, with each couple given two dances to 'set out their stalls.'
[*]At the end of week 2, the judges' scores for week 1 and 2 would be combined, with no public vote. The top seven highest scorers would go in to Pool A, and the lowest seven into Pool B.
[*]Pool A would then compete weeks 3, 5, 7, etc, with Pool B competing weeks 4, 6, 8, etc.
[*]In odd-numbered weeks, all the old rules about percentage time in hold, no lifts until later in the competition, etc, would be rigorously enforced.
[*]In the even-numbered weeks, the only rule would be that any routine that doesn't include at least one silly prop leads to instant disqualification. Any couple wishing to skip the time-wasting 90 seconds of "dance" and just get down to the essential business of being rude to the judges would be allowed, nay encouraged, to do so.
[*]Both sets of weeks would proceed as normal to their own finals, with two glitterballs awarded.
[*]The even-numbered weeks would be re-named "Strictly Come Faffingabout," to make it absolutely clear that it's not a dancing contest.
[*]People who actually want to watch a dance contest would be encouraged to watch
their old DVDs of the early series in even-numbered weeks. Or watch the panda-cam all evening. Or even, you know, go out socially or something.[/LIST]
I feel that this Modest Proposal, whilst not representing complete victory for either camp, at least gives both sides some of what they want. And what could be more egalitarian than that?
Can I nominate both Abba and ceemage for post of the day?
.