• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Entertainment
  • Sport
Boxing
<<
<
121 of 158
>>
>
misawa97
28-02-2016
Quigg wasn't get tagged but you can't really win rounds by not throwing and you want judges to award a round to someone.

He was the stronger fighter and I think they will regret not using that strength earlier.

A rematch can happen. Not straight away but it's defiently still on the table.
BelfastGuy125
28-02-2016
Carl's the man!!!! Belfast a proud city again tonight with our champ!!

Quigg a coward for the first half of the match.
misawa97
28-02-2016
Originally Posted by BelfastGuy125:
“Carl's the man!!!! Belfast a proud city again tonight with our champ!!

Quigg a coward for the first half of the match.”

C'mon Frampton wasn't exactly doing much either in the first 6.
batdude_uk1
28-02-2016
Would anyone really want to see a rematch of that fight??

It was boring for the most part, with no-one even attempting anything half decent.

So a rematch, no thanks, they had their chance to impress tonight, and both failed big time.
Nathers7
28-02-2016
Zero chance of a rematch.
NRG
28-02-2016
Originally Posted by BelfastGuy125:
“Quigg a coward for the first half of the match.”

I wouldn't agree with that, his game plan just backfired. I believe Quigg would have won if he started in round 1 the way he started in round 10 so there's nobody to blame but himself or his corner for poor guidance.
owen10
28-02-2016
Which fighters own the other two World title belts as Quigg could fight one of those two
Serial Lurker
28-02-2016
No one will fight Rigondeaux (no mention of him at all on Sky lol) so I suppose Frampton will move up and we can have some tedious manufacturing of a Selby v Frampton fight.
NRG
28-02-2016
They did mention Rigon on SBO and even pulled up his stats.
Serial Lurker
28-02-2016
Must have been afterwards, I was long gone.

Quigg might fight him mind you, he's got nothing to lose.
NRG
28-02-2016
They defo did mention Rigon and another guy who's name escapes me. Rigon would floor both Carl and Scott.
Nathers7
28-02-2016
Originally Posted by NRG:
“They defo did mention Rigo and another guy who's name escapes me. Rigo would floor both Carl and Scott.”

Shingo Wake. He's the IBF mandatory.
NRG
28-02-2016
Originally Posted by Nathers7:
“Shingo Wake. He's the IBF mandatory.”

Yeah that's who it was. He's lost 4 fights Rigon none.
Serial Lurker
28-02-2016
Wake's alright but winnable, and would be the logical next move for Frampton if he's actually staying at super bantam. Otherwise it's Rigondeaux or Donaire, neither of which I think end well (I actually give him a better chance against Rigondeaux).
NRG
28-02-2016
There's chat that Quigg's jaw was possibly broken from round 4 but that's unconfirmed.
getzls
28-02-2016
Originally Posted by NRG:
“There's chat that Quigg's jaw was possibly broken from round 4 but that's unconfirmed.”

Don't know how.
He didn't take his gloves away from his face for that to happen.

I scored it 3 up to Frampton and I was being slightly generous to Quigg in a couple of rounds.

Hard to fight a guy that doesn't want to fight.
misawa97
28-02-2016
Problem for Frampton v Rigo is the money? I don't think there is enough money in the fight for Frampton to take the risk. I don't blame him for that.

Props to Quigg fighting with a broken jaw.

Frampton v Selby @ Featherweight?
nainz
28-02-2016
Shite fight, knew Quigg would start like he did in the Cuban fight but he did even less here. Frampton deserved to win, terrible cards. Jim Watt needs to be KO'd from commentary from now on.

Eddie has put a pic up on twitter of somebody's broken jaw, if it it Quigg's then he did even better in the 2nd half of the fight to fight through with that.

Can't see Frampton taking on Rigondeaux, think he takes the IBF mandatory and drops the WBA.
stu64
28-02-2016
Am completely amazed that Froach and Jim Watt had it as a draw?!! For the the first 5/6 rounds Quigg was just covering his face and did not want to engage in any kind of fighting.

Really frustrating as when he did start to fight in the latter part of the rounds he was on top (bar the last round). Quigg can only blame himself for losing.
getzls
28-02-2016
Originally Posted by stu64:
“Am completely amazed that Froach and Jim Watt had it as a draw?!!.”

Jim Watt's a ranting lunatic
Matt35
28-02-2016
So it looks like frampton is gonna have to vacate a belt because of 2 mandatory challenges from WBC and IBF. It find ridiculous that this is allowed to happen. What's point winning them if you have give one up. Fury had to do same. Surely that needs sorting.
nainz
29-02-2016
I'd love to see Terence Crawford in a unification fight with one of the other title holders.
misawa97
29-02-2016
Originally Posted by Matt35:
“So it looks like frampton is gonna have to vacate a belt because of 2 mandatory challenges from WBC and IBF. It find ridiculous that this is allowed to happen. What's point winning them if you have give one up. Fury had to do same. Surely that needs sorting.”


Not always. The IBF are strict but other bodies usually allow leeway for unification fights.
Makosi's pants
03-03-2016
Fair play to Quigg for fighting on from round four with a fractured jaw but:

It was a fair punch that did the damage and it doesn't excuse the first three rounds where he hardly threw a punch in anger himself.
Nova21
03-03-2016
Originally Posted by Makosi's pants:
“Fair play to Quigg for fighting on from round four with a fractured jaw but:

It was a fair punch that did the damage and it doesn't excuse the first three rounds where he hardly threw a punch in anger himself.”

Exactly, was one dmensional and limited before that happened.
<<
<
121 of 158
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map