Originally Posted by swordman:
“I've heard some nonsense in my time but your nonsense opinion of JC has to be the best. Froch is not fit to lace his gloves and is one very lucky man that JC never got into the ring with him. froch is a one dimensional fighter that leads with his chin, calzaghes speed would have destroyed him.
When you say never fought the best I an assuming you thought that the Jeff lacy fight would go just like it did yes? Or that Kessler wasn't twice the fighter when he fought JC as the one that fought froch. That Kessler would have knocked froch out. So would have lacy, whose career was all but ended by JC such was the beating.
If you had watched the recent ringside with JC and Jones you would understand the reasons it never came to be.
I can only tell you that froch will never ever beat ward nor I suspect does he want too try again. However could you say that same thing if JC was to fight ward, I think not.”
In previous post i said i rated JC higher than Froch. It's just that i much preferred to watch Froch as a fighter and respected him more.
At 'world level' I'd rate JC above Eubanks, Benn, Collins, and Hatton as well!
However, my opinion of him as a true great will never change!
Imho, he never beat a single great fighter at their peak, during his entire career!
Kessler was nothing more than a good European level style of fighter. Good, strong, but very predictable, robotic, slow, easy to hit and really just the kind of fighter the really class Americans used to eat for breakfast.
Lacey was massively overrated and was nothing more than a crude, slow, square on, easy to hit slugger, Yet another fighter who beat up a few moderate fighters and landed a world championship belt due to there being so many belts to fight for.
Where was Joe when Jones, Hopkins, Tarver, Toney were at their peaks? Back home fighting 4th rate WBO fighters and often looking rather average in doing so. Some of his fights and performances were frankly quite dreadful and he looked nowhere near good enough to tackle the real top fighters.
Even when JC fought a totally shot Jones, who's speed, reflexes, punch resistance had completely gone, he threw 1000 punches and still couldn't KO him. Even journeymen fighters have been KO Jones.
The significant thing for me in that fight was the knockdown, for which JC said he didn't see coming. If you take a look at that punch you'll see Jones hit him more with his wrist, rather than a full fist.
Had JC fought a peaktime Jones, he'd have needed to deal with dozens and dozens of punches coming at him much, much faster, much, much harder and coming at him in combinations from all kinds of angles.
It is my honest belief he'd have been completely embarrassed, outclassed and stopped within a few rounds.
Then we can go on to the Hopkins fight.
Again, decked, by a guy who was over 40 years old.
Losing, and frankly being made to look second rate until Hopkins ran out of steam in the closing few rounds, enabling JC to scrape home by the skin of his teeth.
A Hopkins in his 30's would have cantered to a very easy win imho.
I say that as someone who can't stand Hopkins, and find him very boring to watch.