• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • The Apprentice
Laura is on borrowed time
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
kate36
13-11-2010
Originally Posted by bossoftheworld:
“I noticed that they listened more to Sandeesh than to Laura who desperately wanted to do the pitch and might have been better.

She can't seem to 'be heard' and taken seriously.

I think she looks so girly maybe that's what's against her?”

agree re sandeesh, i didnt like her pitch, thought it was flat and boring
JTW
13-11-2010
Originally Posted by Sherlock_Holmes:
“In what way are the other women on the show Stepford Wives ”


Being willing to put out an ad that says women are happy to do all the cleaning whilst hubby sits back and waits for her to finish. That's what was obvious to me from the women in the winning team.............i.e. Stepford Wives.
JTW
13-11-2010
Originally Posted by kate36:
“agree re sandeesh, i didnt like her pitch, thought it was flat and boring”

Me too.
trollface
13-11-2010
Originally Posted by JTW:
“Being willing to put out an ad that says women are happy to do all the cleaning whilst hubby sits back and waits for her to finish. That's what was obvious to me from the women in the winning team.............i.e. Stepford Wives.”

While the advert was appallingly sexist, that's not quite the advert they made. In the version they filmed, the husband was putting the child to bed while the wife cleaned up. That wasn't in the finished product as they cut that part of it for time, but the advert the girls were happy making wasn't quite as bad as the finished product. It did show a division of labour.
worpler
13-11-2010
Originally Posted by JTW:
“Being willing to put out an ad that says women are happy to do all the cleaning whilst hubby sits back and waits for her to finish. That's what was obvious to me from the women in the winning team.............i.e. Stepford Wives.”

...and the implication was that the missus was going to finish hubby after she had finished the cleaning......I am amazed that team won...
trollface
13-11-2010
Originally Posted by worpler:
“...and the implication was that the missus was going to finish hubby after she had finished the cleaning......I am amazed that team won...”

They didn't win because the implications of the advert were worthy, they won because they had an 8-way split screen outlining the different things the product could clean while the other team chose a name that highlighted killing germs and an advert that highlighted cleaning gravy.
thefoxmistress
13-11-2010
Originally Posted by conchie:
“She has a career ahead of her as a Kate Middleton lookalike !!!”

Srsly?

I thought she was more Linda Blair a la "Exorcist"
brangdon
13-11-2010
Originally Posted by -Sid-:
“Lucinda had a much better head on her shoulders and was very adept at leading people.”

I wouldn't say "very adept". The first time she led, she lost, because she let a sub-team run amock. The second time, she won, but mainly because she had by far the strongest candidates on her team (including Raef and the two finalists, Claire and Lee).

That said, she was OK and Laura was worse; actively bad. I'm no fan of Laura. However, by the end of the 4th series I had come to the conclusion that Lucinda was poisonous, knowingly passive-aggressive and manipulative, so I'd rather work with Laura. Laura whinged in private too much, but with the right team she could be valuable.
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map