Sandeesh seems to be getting the most criticism so far on this show, with many people arguing that she contributes least on tasks. But I'm still failing to see what's so bad about her...the main thing I can see is that she isn't as loud as the others and hasn't been as keen to put herself forward for things. But it's not like she's been particularly abrasive, rubbed people up the wrong way, unproffessional or made any stupid decisions, which is not something that can be said about many of the other candidates.
She's definitely played it on the safe side yes, but does that necessarily mean she's not doing as much work as everyone else?
Take today's task for instance. There were a few key roles to be filled in the task. One is coming up with the idea, which is just a discussion around the table; another is product design; another is direction of the video, and another is presentation. The direction can only be done by one person, the product design was outside of her control (since handled by Alex and Laura). What else is there to do but help out and support the others in their efforts as best as she can?
It seems 'contribution' in this show is assessed based on 1) volunteering for things (for which you may or may not be right for) 2) simply shouting the loudest and voicing your opinion on every matter just for the sake of it or 3) individual sales targets (despite the fact that they're supposedly working in a team).
Given the show is about business talent, shouldn't the focus also be on business acumen, people skills, presentation skills, decision making, passion, etc.
I'm not saying she has those things, and maybe she doesn't, but I think there is a serious misalignment in the show between what they assess as 'contribution' to the tasks, and how hard someone actually works in the task and how [u]effective and supportive they are as a member of that team.
One other thing, she is often criticised for the bread making task where she moaned a lot. This is where the three of them were in the factory and that surgeon made the moronic decision to just take any quantity of order received, and for products not even on their list - so they were basically given an impossible order to fill and she clearly saw that as an attempt to later lay blame on them when it all went tits up. Both the other guys felt the same and agreed with her, and rightly so, but she didn't have the sense to not moan too much on camera as they did. So I think that shouldn't be a reflection on her contribition to that task, she still worked as hard as the other two all day in that factory did she not?
She's definitely played it on the safe side yes, but does that necessarily mean she's not doing as much work as everyone else?
Take today's task for instance. There were a few key roles to be filled in the task. One is coming up with the idea, which is just a discussion around the table; another is product design; another is direction of the video, and another is presentation. The direction can only be done by one person, the product design was outside of her control (since handled by Alex and Laura). What else is there to do but help out and support the others in their efforts as best as she can?
It seems 'contribution' in this show is assessed based on 1) volunteering for things (for which you may or may not be right for) 2) simply shouting the loudest and voicing your opinion on every matter just for the sake of it or 3) individual sales targets (despite the fact that they're supposedly working in a team).
Given the show is about business talent, shouldn't the focus also be on business acumen, people skills, presentation skills, decision making, passion, etc.
I'm not saying she has those things, and maybe she doesn't, but I think there is a serious misalignment in the show between what they assess as 'contribution' to the tasks, and how hard someone actually works in the task and how [u]effective and supportive they are as a member of that team.
One other thing, she is often criticised for the bread making task where she moaned a lot. This is where the three of them were in the factory and that surgeon made the moronic decision to just take any quantity of order received, and for products not even on their list - so they were basically given an impossible order to fill and she clearly saw that as an attempt to later lay blame on them when it all went tits up. Both the other guys felt the same and agreed with her, and rightly so, but she didn't have the sense to not moan too much on camera as they did. So I think that shouldn't be a reflection on her contribition to that task, she still worked as hard as the other two all day in that factory did she not?