Originally Posted by Samantha_Who:
“My "does it matter" was in reference to Alex blaming this on Sandeesh. He never critised the other 2 at the focus group, for this just who he precieved as the one more likely to go home in the BR. Chris was critised for the advert, and Stuart who did next to nothing wasnt critised at all. He was grasping at straw with Sandeesh, and everyone knew it. She was the only member who recieved positive feedback. Bringing Stuart in the BR, he may have had a chance at staying by stating Stuart did the least.
Given Alex's background he would known how important the focus groups feedback is, so if he was never given that info why didnt he ring them or ask them what was said? If he told the truth and those at the focus never told him, the fact Alex never had the initiative to get that info off them speaks volumes! Besides he did his own market research and made the mistake of ignoring the obvious. He made a conscious decision to "make it stand out" by going with the colour scheme he did. And if Lord Sugar and the Advertisers liked it, he would have taken the credit for it. As it happens, they hated it so he looked for a scapegoat for his mistake! Useless!”
Wow, you don't like Alex do you?

I'm not defending him I'm trying to get to the bottom of a missing link.
We're speculating but my point was given half the team was sent out on a focus group task, pretty sure there was some kind of debrief and I have a feeling the bottle colour info was never communicated back...by omission on the part of those who went...? We saw them having a conversation.
And I stress again, no one knows
everything about how to design and market a product which is why focus group data is critical. Any data the other group gleaned would normally override anything he and Laura gleaned by looking at rows of cleaning products in the supermaket as they didn't actually speak to shoppers, did they?
As useless as you think Alex may be, I don't think even he would be prepared to commit hari kari by ignoring that data.