|
||||||||
Does previous dancing experience matter |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Twinkle Towers
Posts: 636
|
Quote:
Nobody has mentioned the fact that - 'Ann Widdecomb has the advantage of being of an age when ballroom dancing would have been the norm in her youth'............I am quoting Craig Revel-Horward who said this in defence of the producers, claiming that they had no way of knowing that she would be any less able than the other celebs.
Wow! All that previous dance training and she still looks ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 15,736
|
Quote:
Matt obviously believes it matters to a whole chunk of voters. He looked quite cross when Claudia revisited his BP dancing days on ITT and it took him a while to rearrange his face when the camera was back on him
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Secret Britain!
Posts: 3,705
|
Quote:
Rearrange his face! That did make me laugh.
![]() ![]() I take his disco-dancing from a decade ago to be less of an advantage than his general fitness and gymnastic background, but if we're going to start penalising people for being fit on this show, then no wonder we often get a winner who isn't the best dancer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,563
|
I like to see people learning on the show and would like to know what their starting point was. I'm not so much against previous experience as wanting to have an idea of how much they are learning.
Some celebs may have done quite a lot of dancing but don't seem to improve a lot and others do visibly improve on the show. Austin and Ramps were examples of guys who seemed to have only done some social home-designed dancing, but were very quick at learning the SCD dances. Its hard enough to get real characters on the show without excluding those who have danced a bit. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Posts: 8,044
|
Yes, I thought Matt looked embarrassed when they showed the cringeworthy early dancing experience too. I certainly would have. Amazing how differently people can interpret the same thing.
As for a level playing field - how impossible is that to achieve? You would need to get people of roughly the same age, same background (i.e. no acting, or sporting experience either), same pleasability (a word I just invented) in terms of looks. Wouldn't it be boring. If you have a natural talent learning must be easy, but no amount of training will help if you don't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Posts: 8,044
|
Quote:
She's younger than me!!! We were in to Rock&Roll
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Secret Britain!
Posts: 3,705
|
Quote:
If you have a natural talent learning must be easy, but no amount of training will help if you don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,654
|
I think it matters generally to the audiences. People from a music or acting (/assumed stage school) background tend to drop out earlier than their scores indicate, whereas people from a sports or presenting background (ie presumed no dance experience) tend to do better than their scores indicate they should.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 12,662
|
The minute you get "actors" who went to drama school (like Scott & Jimi)...chances are they did some kind of movement/interpretation classes....is this dancing???
"Sports people" may still be quite fit (depending on when they retired) and might be expected to have some kind of stamina/physical control...is this an advantage??? "Singers" might have wiggled around a bit on stage...is that any training for dancing in hold with a partner????
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 47
|
[quote=Smokeychan1;45601643]no. I thought Len pointing out that Matt "must have dancing experience"
When did he say that ? on last ITT? Ferney |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: 🍷 🎼 ☔
Posts: 10,117
|
Quote:
I think it matters generally to the audiences. People from a music or acting (/assumed stage school) background tend to drop out earlier than their scores indicate, whereas people from a sports or presenting background (ie presumed no dance experience) tend to do better than their scores indicate they should.
Perhaps what is happening is the viewers are becoming more polarised. Between those who like entertaining beginners and those who like some dancing ability. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 12,636
|
Quote:
It gives Kara an unfair advantage as it did for the guy on dancing on ice who went on to win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,284
|
Quote:
It gives Kara an unfair advantage as it did for the guy on dancing on ice who went on to win.
I've said it before and i'll say it again....it only makes people angry/annoyed when the celeb turns out to be a good dancer like Kara. I doubt Michelles previous dancing experience is mentioned much anymore |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 9,286
|
[quote=ferney;45609743] Quote:
no. I thought Len pointing out that Matt "must have dancing experience"
When did he say that ? on last ITT? Ferney I think the idea of having absolute beginners would be awful. A show full of Shilts, Widdecombes and Daniels would not be fun at all. Having said that, Ive often hankered for a spin-off after the main show is over, showing the development of the celebs in their first week or two of training. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stuck to Mark's cricket bat
Posts: 3,216
|
Quote:
"Sports people" may still be quite fit (depending on when they retired) and might be expected to have some kind of stamina/physical control...is this an advantage???
Sportspeople have the advantage of being used to putting in long, hard hours of training, but they actually have a disadvantage in that the muscle memory they will have built up playing rugby, cricket or football will be totally alien to that required for dancing. If anything it's a problem, having to unlearn what they've spent years learning. It must feel rather unnatural to some. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,714
|
[quote=Smokeychan1;45614597] Quote:
Yes, when he and Craig were reviewing the training. I think the idea of having absolute beginners would be awful. A show full of Shilts, Widdecombes and Daniels would not be fun at all. Having said that, Ive often hankered for a spin-off after the main show is over, showing the development of the celebs in their first week or two of training. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,506
|
You can be a natural - and if you are then that's helpful. But if you want to win then yes, having previous dance experience is going to help. You can always spot those who have had some sort of training.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,792
|
I think it would be good if sometime during the series preferably at the beginning, it was made absolutely clear what experience people have. It might be of no advantage at all, that they have some experience! It should be up to the viewers, to weigh that up though, I think. I agree about natural talent. Some people are just naturally good dancers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 47
|
[quote=ferney;45609743] Quote:
no. I thought Len pointing out that Matt "must have dancing experience"
When did he say that ? on last ITT? Ferney Yes, when he and Craig were reviewing the training. I think you will find it was when they were reviewing pams training Len said she must have had dance experience not Matt, even though he has Len didn't say it. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:27.





