Originally Posted by LFC1892:
“Considering he did have the least amount of votes that would have been unfair on Katie.”
That's the whole point of
having the judges choose. Sometimes a fluke happens and someone unexpected ends up in the bottom two ( complacency factor ) The judges are in a position to 'save' that person and give them a second chance ... even if they were bottom of the voting
In this case it was obvious that the person who has been in the bottom two for four weeks on the trot was the one who did
not deserve another chance ... given that she'd had three already