Originally Posted by SCD-Observer:
“Matt is really talented. He dances well, so far not a 'ten' dance yet but it's fine. Monkseal et al. think the producers are making him into the Tom Chambers, Chris Hollins, Mark Ramprakash kinda guy, i.e. eventual winner sort of guy and that delayed 'ten' thingie is just to give him the impression he's also on a journey. That said, Matt has yet done a dance worth a ten. His time will come, but I would rather it be later rather than earlier. Methinks he's going to get one in Blackpool though...
Scott may not be as talented as Matt, but he worked really, really hard (not to say Matt's not working hard) and he does PERFORM his dance better than Matt (except his horrible rhumba, which I can't abide, watched it once and that's enough!) most of the time, so thus far I don't see why he should not be praised for his efforts.”
You've hit the nail on the head there. If only Matt realised that the judges are doing him an favour for not giving him an 10.
Imagine being an good dancer from the start of the show and to continually get a 10 for the mediocre performances in the last couple of weeks by Matt would certainly turn the viewers off.
If he now comes back with a great dance, it will be moment for him and he could possibly get the first 40 of the series.
So please Matt do us favour and shut up about your lack of 10’s, until you do a performance worthy of it.